Columbia, WA

Low Risk (0/100)

Transparent derived index from EPA TRI / SDWIS / Superfund extracts: not an official EPA rating. Fixed caps: facilities ≤25 pts (50+ = max), log10 releases ≤25 pts, Superfund ≤25 pts (5/site), health-violation systems ≤15 pts (3/system), high-chemical facilities ≤10 pts. Bands: High ≥60, Moderate ≥30. See methodology.

Environmental data for Columbia in Washington · Population: 3,996

SDWIS systems such as DAYTON WATER DEPARTMENT; STARBUCK CITY OF anchor Columbia, WA's EPA extract. Derived burden score 0/100 (Low Risk) uses fixed national caps on density, log release volume, Superfund count, and health-flagged systems - not an official EPA rating.

No TRI Form R facilities sit in Columbia in this extract; water coverage still lists DAYTON WATER DEPARTMENT; STARBUCK CITY OF. AQS monitors logged median AQI 36 / peak 90 in 2024.

Burden score 0/100 (Low Risk) is the only weighted composite on this page. The tables below list every TRI facility, SDWIS system, and Superfund site EPA has on record for Columbia -- not just the names called out above -- reproducing the disclosure history as filed, not a current-safety verdict. Extract current as of 2026-08-25.

County population (Census ACS)
3,996
TRI Facilities
0
Water Systems
2
Superfund Sites
0
Total Releases
0 lbs

Air Quality History (2020–2024)

EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) data showing how many days per year fall into each air quality category.

Year Good Moderate Unhealthy (SG) Max AQI
2024 331 (90%) 35 0 90
2023 319 (87%) 43 0 259
2022 314 (86%) 47 4 135
2021 304 (83%) 53 3 172
2020 323 (88%) 34 0 258
2024 Good Air Quality: 90% of days
Median AQI: 36

Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County AQI categories: Good (0-50), Moderate (51-100), Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (101-150), Unhealthy (151-200), Very Unhealthy (201-300), Hazardous (301+)

For real-time air quality readings and pollutant breakdowns in Washington, see the EPA's AirNow.gov.

Water Systems (2)

System System pop (SDWIS) Violations
DAYTON WATER DEPARTMENT 3,374 0
STARBUCK CITY OF 147 0

Cities in Columbia (2)

Dayton
0 facilities · 1 water
Starbuck
0 facilities · 1 water

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the environmental risk level in Columbia, Washington?
Columbia, WA has an environmental risk score of 0/100 (Low Risk), based on 0 TRI facilities, 0 Superfund sites, and 2 water systems on record. No water systems have current health-based violations. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL.
Are there Superfund sites in Columbia?
No Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) sites are currently registered in Columbia, WA in the EPA database.
How many toxic release facilities are in Columbia?
Columbia, WA has 0 TRI-reporting facilities on record with the EPA Toxic Release Inventory. TRI facilities self-report annual chemical release data to the EPA.
What is the air quality in Columbia?
In 2024, Columbia, WA recorded a median AQI of 36 and a peak AQI of 90. 90% of monitored days had "Good" air quality (AQI 0–50). Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County.
Is the drinking water safe in Columbia?
Columbia, WA has 2 EPA-regulated water systems. No health-based violations are currently on record. For current water quality, contact your local water utility. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental agencies cover Columbia?
Environmental compliance in Columbia, Washington is overseen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the federal level and the Washington state environmental agency. Facilities report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory, water systems are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and contaminated sites are managed under the Superfund program. Contact your state environmental agency for local concerns.

What does this county environmental profile show?

This county environmental profile rolls up EPA Toxics Release Inventory facility reports, Safe Drinking Water Information System public-water-system filings, and Superfund National Priorities List sites for the county boundary defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Facility counts reflect facilities with a reporting address inside the county, not where downstream environmental effects may be observed. Population figures are from the most recent Census ACS 5-year estimate. The county detail page is updated whenever the upstream EPA programs publish revised data; see the methodology page for the documented ingest cadence and the editorial choices governing how aggregations are computed.

Related

Data sourced from U.S. EPA environmental datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro