Cumberland, NC
A PlainEnviro-computed score from reported facility/violation counts, not an official EPA rating, health forecast, or population-adjusted rate. See methodology. This is a different measure than the EJ Screening score for this county, which ranks it by percentile against every other tracked county rather than against fixed national thresholds.
Environmental data for Cumberland in North Carolina · Population: 336,749
Cumberland, NC is tracked across three EPA datasets covering 13 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities, 9 Safe Drinking Water Act systems, and 0 Superfund National Priorities List sites. Together these generate an environmental burden score of 39/100 (Moderate Risk), calibrated against national distributions for facility density, chemical release volume, Superfund concentration, and water-system health violations.
Industrial disclosures inside the county total 5.9M lbs of reported toxic releases under EPCRA Section 313, while 1 water system carries an active health-based violation in the SDWIS record. EPA Air Quality System monitors logged a median AQI of 46 and a peak AQI of 110 in 2024, with 64% of observed days rated "Good" (0–50).
All figures below draw directly from federal EPA records, TRI self-reported emissions, SDWIS compliance history, NPL Hazard Ranking System scores, and AQS daily AQI summaries, and are not adjusted, weighted, or forecast. A past violation or elevated score does not itself indicate current unsafe conditions; it documents the regulatory and disclosure history publicly filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the most recent reporting cycle.
Air Quality History (2020–2024)
EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) data showing how many days per year fall into each air quality category.
| Year | Good | Moderate | Unhealthy (SG) | Max AQI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 233 (64%) | 132 | 1 | 110 |
| 2023 | 201 (55%) | 163 | 1 | 129 |
| 2022 | 231 (64%) | 128 | 1 | 115 |
| 2021 | 227 (62%) | 137 | 1 | 107 |
| 2020 | 280 (77%) | 83 | 0 | 83 |
Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County AQI categories: Good (0-50), Moderate (51-100), Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (101-150), Unhealthy (151-200), Very Unhealthy (201-300), Hazardous (301+)
For real-time air quality readings and pollutant breakdowns in North Carolina, see the EPA's AirNow.gov.
Water Systems (9)
| System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC WORKS COMM | 215,590 | 0 |
| OLD NORTH UTILITIES SERVICES/FT BRAGG | 65,000 | 0 |
| EASTOVER SANITARY DISTRICT | 8,150 | 0 |
| FORT BRAGG LINDEN OAKS | 3,733 | 0 |
| LINDEN, TOWN OF | 2,077 | 1 |
| STEDMAN, TOWN OF | 1,705 | 0 |
| WADE, TOWN OF | 780 | 0 |
| FALCON WATER SYSTEM | 714 | 0 |
| 401 MOBILE HOME PARK | 75 | 0 |
TRI Facilities (13)
| # | Facility | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cargill Inc | 2.5M lbs |
| 2 | U.S. Army Fort Bragg | 2.3M lbs |
| 3 | Hexion Inc-Fayetteville Facility | 455.3K lbs |
| 4 | Alpek Polyester USA LLC | 347.3K lbs |
| 5 | Darling Ingredients Inc - Fayetteville Facility | 236.5K lbs |
| 6 | American Phoenix Inc. | 30.1K lbs |
| 7 | Mann + Hummel Purolator Filters LLC | 16.5K lbs |
| 8 | The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co Fayetteville Plant | 6.4K lbs |
| 9 | Eaton - Fayetteville | 265 lbs |
| 10 | Oldcastle Precast Inc | 162 lbs |
| 11 | Steelfab of Fayetteville | 94 lbs |
| 12 | S&w Fayetteville Plant | 0 lbs |
| 13 | S&w Spring Lake Plant | 0 lbs |
Cities in Cumberland (3)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the environmental risk level in Cumberland, North Carolina? ▼
Are there Superfund sites in Cumberland? ▼
How many toxic release facilities are in Cumberland? ▼
What is the air quality in Cumberland? ▼
Is the drinking water safe in Cumberland? ▼
What environmental agencies cover Cumberland? ▼
What does this county environmental profile show?
This county environmental profile rolls up EPA Toxics Release Inventory facility reports, Safe Drinking Water Information System public-water-system filings, and Superfund National Priorities List sites for the county boundary defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Facility counts reflect facilities with a reporting address inside the county, not where downstream environmental effects may be observed. Population figures are from the most recent Census ACS 5-year estimate. The county detail page is updated whenever the upstream EPA programs publish revised data; see the methodology page for the documented ingest cadence and the editorial choices governing how aggregations are computed.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.