Snohomish, WA
Transparent derived index from EPA TRI / SDWIS / Superfund extracts: not an official EPA rating. Fixed caps: facilities ≤25 pts (50+ = max), log10 releases ≤25 pts, Superfund ≤25 pts (5/site), health-violation systems ≤15 pts (3/system), high-chemical facilities ≤10 pts. Bands: High ≥60, Moderate ≥30. See methodology.
Environmental data for Snohomish in Washington · Population: 834,648
TRI sites such as Boeing Commercial Airplanes - Everett; Cepheid - Bothell; Blue Streak Finishers Ltd; SDWIS systems such as ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT; EVERETT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CITY OF; MARYSVILLE UTILITIES; NPL sites such as Tulalip Landfill anchor Snohomish, WA's EPA extract. Derived burden score 64/100 (High Risk) uses fixed national caps on density, log release volume, Superfund count, and health-flagged systems - not an official EPA rating.
Health-flagged SDWIS rows in Snohomish include TULALIP BAY WATER DIST #1; PORT SUSAN CAMP CLUB #3; MADRONA BEACH COMM WATER SYSTEM, while Boeing Commercial Airplanes - Everett leads reported TRI pounds among local Form R filers. AQS median AQI 38 / peak 99 in 2024.
Burden score 64/100 (High Risk) is the only weighted composite on this page. The tables below list every TRI facility, SDWIS system, and Superfund site EPA has on record for Snohomish -- not just the names called out above -- reproducing the disclosure history as filed, not a current-safety verdict. Extract current as of 2026-08-25.
Release-over-release change
What changed for Snohomish, WA: EPA TRI 2023 reporting year
Same facilities, both years
-9.4%
22 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
-9.6%
228.5 thousand lb → 206.6 thousand lb, every facility that filed
Between the two reporting years, 3 facilities filed for the first time and 2 stopped filing. Facilities entering or leaving the inventory are excluded from the same-facility comparison above.
- Snohomish, WA's total reported releases fell from 227.8 thousand lb in 2022 to 206.4 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Snohomish, WA's land releases rose from 1.2 thousand lb in 2022 to 1.8 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Snohomish, WA's off-site transfers fell from 100.3 thousand lb in 2022 to 59.3 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Snohomish, WA's air releases rose from 126.2 thousand lb in 2022 to 145.3 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
Air Quality History (2020–2024)
EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) data showing how many days per year fall into each air quality category.
| Year | Good | Moderate | Unhealthy (SG) | Max AQI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 262 (72%) | 104 | 0 | 99 |
| 2023 | 246 (67%) | 116 | 2 | 175 |
| 2022 | 210 (58%) | 129 | 13 | 362 |
| 2021 | 248 (68%) | 114 | 3 | 137 |
| 2020 | 234 (64%) | 122 | 3 | 250 |
Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County AQI categories: Good (0-50), Moderate (51-100), Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (101-150), Unhealthy (151-200), Very Unhealthy (201-300), Hazardous (301+)
For real-time air quality readings and pollutant breakdowns in Washington, see the EPA's AirNow.gov.
Water Systems (107)
| System | System pop (SDWIS) | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT | 245,715 | 0 |
| EVERETT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CITY OF | 215,774 | 0 |
| MARYSVILLE UTILITIES | 88,582 | 0 |
| LYNNWOOD CITY OF | 68,204 | 0 |
| SILVER LAKE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT | 65,033 | 0 |
| EDMONDS CITY OF | 34,065 | 0 |
| Mukilteo Water & Wastewater Distr | 31,437 | 0 |
| ARLINGTON CITY OF | 29,508 | 0 |
| MOUNTLAKE TERRACE CITY OF | 26,402 | 0 |
| CROSS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT | 24,695 | 0 |
| MONROE WATER SYSTEM | 23,467 | 0 |
| OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT | 17,784 | 0 |
| STANWOOD WATER DEPT CITY OF | 17,586 | 0 |
| SNOHOMISH CITY OF | 16,367 | 0 |
| SULTAN WATER DEPARTMENT | 8,424 | 0 |
| TULALIP BAY WATER DIST #1 | 5,968 | 2 |
| SEVEN LAKES WATER ASSOCIATION | 5,823 | 0 |
| GRANITE FALLS CITY OF | 5,349 | 0 |
| HIGHLAND WATER DISTRICT | 3,121 | 0 |
| GOLD BAR CITY OF | 2,745 | 0 |
| Darrington Town of | 2,246 | 0 |
| PORT SUSAN CAMP CLUB #1 | 1,500 | 0 |
| PORT SUSAN CAMP CLUB #2 | 1,000 | 0 |
| PORT SUSAN CAMP CLUB #3 | 1,000 | 2 |
| PRIEST POINT BEACH WATER INC | 624 | 0 |
| MADRONA BEACH COMM WATER SYSTEM | 539 | 4 |
| WILKSHIRE LANE WATER DISTRICT INC | 460 | 0 |
| INDEX WATER DEPT | 420 | 0 |
| BIG BEND LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION | 419 | 0 |
| HAT ISLAND COMMUNITY INC | 348 | 0 |
| MACHIAS RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. | 324 | 0 |
| CAMANO LAGUNA VISTA WATER ASSOC | 310 | 0 |
| CEDAR SPRINGS CAMP | 308 | 0 |
| NEW UTSALADY WATER SYSTEM INC | 291 | 0 |
| EAGLE RIDGE | 250 | 0 |
| AQUA COPIA/HORSE COUNTRY ESTATES | 250 | 0 |
| LOCHAVEN WATER | 225 | 0 |
| SCHLUTER WATER ASSOCIATION | 224 | 0 |
| JUNIPER BEACH WATER DISTRICT | 213 | 0 |
| ROSELAND COMMUNITY CLUB ASSOCIATION | 210 | 0 |
| MOUNTAIN LOOP VIEW TRACTS | 200 | 0 |
| HONEYMOON LAKE | 195 | 0 |
| MEADOW LAKE WATER ASSOCIATION | 171 | 0 |
| CAMANO WEST WATER ASSOCIATION | 167 | 0 |
| LAKESIDE SHORES IMPROVEMENT ASSOC. | 166 | 0 |
| SUNSET WATER DISTRIBUTION ASSOC | 159 | 0 |
| FRIAR CREEK WATER SYSTEM | 135 | 0 |
| NORTH RIDGE WATER CORP | 135 | 0 |
| KATHANN ESTATES WATER | 134 | 0 |
| SAM LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION | 128 | 0 |
| PARKLANE WATER ASSOCIATION | 127 | 2 |
| GREENWATER MEADOWS LANDOWNERS ASSN | 122 | 0 |
| INDIAN RIDGE WATER COMPANY | 120 | 0 |
| LIVINGSTON BAY COMMUNITY ASSN | 120 | 0 |
| WOODLAND HEIGHTS | 108 | 0 |
| PILCHUCK RIVIERA #2 | 107 | 0 |
| ARLINGTON EAST MUTUAL WATER ASSN. | 100 | 0 |
| TYEE BEACH 2 WATER ASSOCIATION | 98 | 0 |
| LAKE KI SUNRISE ADDITION WATER | 96 | 0 |
| NEW START LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION | 90 | 0 |
| PILCHUCK RIVIERA #1 | 90 | 0 |
| OLYMPIC MARINE VIEW WATER ASSOC | 89 | 2 |
| MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE WATER INC | 87 | 0 |
| MADISON ESTATES | 86 | 0 |
| GAYS WATER DISTRICT ASSOCIATION | 81 | 0 |
| MERIDIAN WATER SYSTEM | 81 | 0 |
| SAUK-SUIATTLE | 80 | 2 |
| UTSALADY WATER | 80 | 0 |
| CAMANO SHORES COMMUNITY | 79 | 0 |
| CHEALCO WATER SUPPLY | 78 | 0 |
| Peoples Creek Water System | 76 | 0 |
| ARLINGTON VIEW ESTATES WATER ASSOC | 75 | 0 |
| THUNDERBIRD TERRACE WATER SYSTEM | 75 | 1 |
| TULALIP SHORES WATER SYSTEM | 74 | 0 |
| SNUG HARBOR MHC | 71 | 0 |
| NORTH HIGH ROCK ESTATES W.S. | 68 | 0 |
| KYAK RIDGE WATER SYSTEM | 66 | 0 |
| PILCHUCK 26 TRACTS | 66 | 0 |
| SUNNY SHORES COMMUNITY CLUB | 60 | 0 |
| ARLINGTON HEIGHTS WATER CO INC | 57 | 0 |
| PLEASANT VIEW WATER COMPANY | 57 | 0 |
| PALISADES ASSN | 53 | 0 |
| TULALIP WOOD WATER SYSTEM | 52 | 0 |
| FOREST GROVE MOBILE HOME PARK | 51 | 0 |
| TWIN ROADS WATER ASSOCIATION | 50 | 0 |
| ODDFELLOWS PARK | 50 | 0 |
| MOUNT FOREST WATER SYSTEM | 50 | 0 |
| BRUTUS WATER SYSTEM | 48 | 0 |
| RIVERSIDE WATER DIST #1 | 48 | 0 |
| SEVENTH HEAVEN COUNTRY CLUB | 48 | 0 |
| PANTHER LAKE COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM | 47 | 0 |
| POINT LOWELL/PARKSIDE | 46 | 0 |
| DELIA JIMICUM WATER DISTRICT | 42 | 0 |
| DARRINGTON WATER ASSOCIATION | 42 | 0 |
| DRIFTWOOD HEIGHTS #2 COMMUNITY ASSN | 40 | 0 |
| TULARE ESTATES | 38 | 4 |
| BUNK FOSS SYSTEM | 36 | 0 |
| MEADOWBROOK HOMEOWNERS ASSN | 35 | 0 |
| 60TH STREET WATER WORKS | 35 | 0 |
| Lakewood Garden Tracts Water Assoc | 33 | 0 |
| OLYMPIC VIEW ESTATES | 33 | 0 |
| FERN BLUFF ESTATES | 30 | 0 |
| SARATOGA TERRACE WATER | 30 | 0 |
| MC PHERSON HILLS WATER SYSTEM | 30 | 0 |
| SEASCAPE WATER ASSOCIATION | 28 | 0 |
| GREEN VELVET WATER SYSTEM | 26 | 0 |
| WOODS CREEK WATER DISTRICT | 25 | 0 |
TRI Facilities (31)
Superfund Sites (1)
| Site Name | Status | HRS Score |
|---|---|---|
| Tulalip Landfill | Deleted NPL Site | 50.00 |
Cities in Snohomish (19)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the environmental risk level in Snohomish, Washington? ▼
Are there Superfund sites in Snohomish? ▼
How many toxic release facilities are in Snohomish? ▼
What is the air quality in Snohomish? ▼
Is the drinking water safe in Snohomish? ▼
What environmental agencies cover Snohomish? ▼
What does this county environmental profile show?
This county environmental profile rolls up EPA Toxics Release Inventory facility reports, Safe Drinking Water Information System public-water-system filings, and Superfund National Priorities List sites for the county boundary defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Facility counts reflect facilities with a reporting address inside the county, not where downstream environmental effects may be observed. Population figures are from the most recent Census ACS 5-year estimate. The county detail page is updated whenever the upstream EPA programs publish revised data; see the methodology page for the documented ingest cadence and the editorial choices governing how aggregations are computed.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.