Washington, MN

Moderate Risk (41/100)

A PlainEnviro-computed score from reported facility/violation counts, not an official EPA rating, health forecast, or population-adjusted rate. See methodology. This is a different measure than the EJ Screening score for this county, which ranks it by percentile against every other tracked county rather than against fixed national thresholds.

Environmental data for Washington in Minnesota · Population: 272,298

Washington, MN is tracked across three EPA datasets covering 18 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities, 30 Safe Drinking Water Act systems, and 0 Superfund National Priorities List sites. Together these generate an environmental burden score of 41/100 (Moderate Risk), calibrated against national distributions for facility density, chemical release volume, Superfund concentration, and water-system health violations.

Industrial disclosures inside the county total 5.7M lbs of reported toxic releases under EPCRA Section 313, while 1 water system carries an active health-based violation in the SDWIS record. EPA Air Quality System monitors logged a median AQI of 35 and a peak AQI of 58 in 2024, with 98% of observed days rated "Good" (0–50).

All figures below draw directly from federal EPA records, TRI self-reported emissions, SDWIS compliance history, NPL Hazard Ranking System scores, and AQS daily AQI summaries, and are not adjusted, weighted, or forecast. A past violation or elevated score does not itself indicate current unsafe conditions; it documents the regulatory and disclosure history publicly filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the most recent reporting cycle.

Population
272,298
TRI Facilities
18
Water Systems
30
Superfund Sites
0
Total Releases
5.7M lbs

Air Quality History (2020–2024)

EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) data showing how many days per year fall into each air quality category.

Year Good Moderate Unhealthy (SG) Max AQI
2024 241 (98%) 5 0 58
2023 194 (81%) 38 8 140
2022 212 (93%) 15 0 90
2021 205 (90%) 21 1 119
2020 210 (98%) 5 0 77
2024 Good Air Quality: 98% of days
Median AQI: 35

Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County AQI categories: Good (0-50), Moderate (51-100), Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (101-150), Unhealthy (151-200), Very Unhealthy (201-300), Hazardous (301+)

For real-time air quality readings and pollutant breakdowns in Minnesota, see the EPA's AirNow.gov.

Water Systems (30)

System Population Violations
Woodbury 82,643 0
Cottage Grove 39,712 0
Oakdale 28,674 0
Stillwater 19,462 0
Lake Elmo 10,978 0
Mahtomedi 8,134 0
Saint Paul Park 5,427 0
Oak Park Heights 4,776 0
Newport 4,000 0
Centerville 3,962 0
Lakeland Municipal Water 3,500 0
Bayport 2,700 0
Cimarron Park 2,400 0
MN Correctional Facility - Stillwater 781 0
Brookside Mobile Home Park 550 0
Willernie 525 0
Preserve at Birch Lake 388 1
Woodlund Mobile Home Park 330 0
Hugo Estates 300 0
Baldwin Lake Estates 235 0
Indian Hills Development 156 0
Jackson Meadow 95 0
Sun Bay LLC 90 0
Bay Lake Reserve Development 80 0
Oakhill Cottages 65 0
Lazy Acres Trailer Park 50 0
Scandia Water Company 35 0
Marine Stugas Townhomes 28 0
Cedar Terrace Mobile Home Park 25 0
Hilltop Water Company 25 0

TRI Facilities (18)

# Facility Total Releases
1 3M Chemical Operations' Cottage Grove Facility 3.0M lbs
2 Xcel Energy A. S. King Generating Plant 1.3M lbs
3 St Paul Park Refining Co LLC 945.3K lbs
4 Andersen Corp 318.8K lbs
5 Lsp - Cottage Grove LP 152.9K lbs
6 Advance Corp 23.6K lbs
7 Inliner Solutions LLC 2.6K lbs
8 Holcim - Mwr Inc. Newport Ready Mix 2.2K lbs
9 Knife River Corp N Central Forest Lake 294 lbs
10 Ayrshire Electronics Mn 5 lbs
11 Cemstone Lakeland 5 lbs
12 Hearing Components Inc. 3 lbs
13 Up North Plastics Inc 0 lbs
14 East Side Jersey Dairy 0 lbs
15 Aveka Cce Technologies 0 lbs
16 Aveka Inc 0 lbs
17 Airgas 0 lbs
18 The Vollrath Co. LLC 0 lbs

Cities in Washington (8)

Bayport
Pop: -
2 facilities · 2 water
Cottage Grove
Pop: -
6 facilities · 2 water
Hugo
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water
Lakeland
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water
Newport
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water
Saint Paul Park
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water
Woodbury
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water
Baytown Township
Pop: -
0 facilities · 0 water

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the environmental risk level in Washington, Minnesota?
Washington, MN has an environmental risk score of 41/100 (Moderate Risk), based on 18 TRI facilities, 0 Superfund sites, and 30 water systems on record. 1 water system have health-based violations. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL.
Are there Superfund sites in Washington?
No Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) sites are currently registered in Washington, MN in the EPA database.
How many toxic release facilities are in Washington?
Washington, MN has 18 TRI-reporting facilities on record with the EPA Toxic Release Inventory, with a combined total of 5.7M lbs in reported toxic releases. TRI facilities self-report annual chemical release data to the EPA.
What is the air quality in Washington?
In 2024, Washington, MN recorded a median AQI of 35 and a peak AQI of 58. 98% of monitored days had "Good" air quality (AQI 0–50). Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County.
Is the drinking water safe in Washington?
Washington, MN has 30 EPA-regulated water systems. 1 system has reported health-based violations (MCL exceedances). A past violation does not necessarily mean water is currently unsafe. For current water quality, contact your local water utility. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental agencies cover Washington?
Environmental compliance in Washington, Minnesota is overseen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the federal level and the Minnesota state environmental agency. Facilities report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory, water systems are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and contaminated sites are managed under the Superfund program. Contact your state environmental agency for local concerns.

What does this county environmental profile show?

This county environmental profile rolls up EPA Toxics Release Inventory facility reports, Safe Drinking Water Information System public-water-system filings, and Superfund National Priorities List sites for the county boundary defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Facility counts reflect facilities with a reporting address inside the county, not where downstream environmental effects may be observed. Population figures are from the most recent Census ACS 5-year estimate. The county detail page is updated whenever the upstream EPA programs publish revised data; see the methodology page for the documented ingest cadence and the editorial choices governing how aggregations are computed.

Related

Data sourced from U.S. EPA environmental datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro Editorial