TRI Facilities
621
EPCRA Section 313 reporters
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List, this is Missouri's (MO) full public environmental-compliance record - toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.
Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks
Clean Water Act, NPDES (water-system health violations)
562 records
RCRA Subtitle C (Superfund-site proxy)
39 records
What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.
TRI Facilities
621
EPCRA Section 313 reporters
Water Systems
1,666
SDWIS regulated
Superfund Sites
39
33 active NPL
Total Releases
280.5M lbs
TRI cumulative disclosure
Missouri consolidates three federal EPA datasets into one statewide environmental profile: 621 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities reporting under EPCRA Section 313, 1,666 community water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and 39 sites on the Superfund National Priorities List.
TRI facilities in MO have cumulatively disclosed 280.5M lbs of toxic chemical releases, while SDWIS records show 6,246 total violations across the state's regulated water systems, of which 562 systems carry an active health-based violation (MCL exceedance or treatment-technique failure). Activity clusters in counties such as St Louis, Stone, Jackson, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence.
Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.
| # | Facility | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buick Mine/mill | 48.2M lbs |
| 2 | Brushy Creek Mine/mill | 30.6M lbs |
| 3 | Buick Resource Recycling Facility LLC | 26.6M lbs |
| 4 | Sweetwater Mine/mill | 22.0M lbs |
| 5 | Fletcher Mine/mill | 19.7M lbs |
| 6 | Ameren Missouri Labadie Energy Center | 8.1M lbs |
| 7 | Associated Electric Cooperative Inc New Madrid Power Plant | 7.7M lbs |
| 8 | Iatan Generating Station | 6.5M lbs |
| 9 | Ford Motor Company--Kansas City Assembly Plant | 5.7M lbs |
| 10 | Enersys Energy Products Inc-Springfield 2 (formerly Northsta | 5.4M lbs |
| 11 | Thomas Hill Energy Center | 5.3M lbs |
| 12 | National Beef Leathers LLC | 5.0M lbs |
| 13 | Tyson Poultry Inc. - Processing Plant | 4.8M lbs |
| 14 | Enersys Energy Products Inc-Springfield 1 (formerly Northsta | 4.1M lbs |
| 15 | Ameren Missouri Sioux Energy Center | 3.9M lbs |
| 16 | Doe Run Co Herculaneum Smelter | 3.8M lbs |
| 17 | Cargill Inc | 3.6M lbs |
| 18 | Biokyowa Inc | 3.6M lbs |
| 19 | Magnitude 7 Metals LLC | 3.1M lbs |
| 20 | Procter & Gamble Mgf St Louis | 2.8M lbs |
| Water System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| CASSIE WATER SYSTEM | 106 | 331 |
| FRANKLIN WATER SYSTEMS 3 | 201 | 306 |
| SOUTH SILVER CREEK I II & III | 291 | 176 |
| ABRAXAS UTILITIES | 792 | 169 |
| TERRE DU LAC | 3,200 | 162 |
| WESTLAKE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION | 50 | 150 |
| SILEX PWS | 206 | 143 |
| MAYSVILLE PWS | 1,096 | 125 |
| CS CITRUS PARK WATER COMPANY | 102 | 124 |
| SOUTH COUNCIL CREEK 2 | 111 | 124 |
| LANAGAN PWS | 373 | 122 |
| MAGNOLIA-SPRING CREEK SUBDIVISION | 444 | 115 |
| CS EL PRADO WATER COMPANY | 404 | 113 |
| COUNCIL CREEK VILLAGE | 333 | 108 |
| LIVE OAK HILLS SUBDIVISION | 65 | 106 |
| MOSBY PWS | 115 | 103 |
| TEXAS LANDING UTILITIES | 420 | 100 |
| VISTA VERDE WATER SYSTEMS | 111 | 92 |
| MONROE CITY PWS | 2,500 | 88 |
| LA PLAYA SUBDIVISION WATER SYSTEM | 59 | 75 |
| County | Facilities |
|---|---|
| St Louis | 48 |
| Stone | 0 |
| Jackson | 65 |
| Franklin | 22 |
| Jasper | 30 |
| Greene | 33 |
| Jefferson | 12 |
| Camden | 2 |
| St Louis (city) | 54 |
| Barry | 11 |
| Clay | 27 |
| Taney | 2 |
| St Charles | 16 |
| Cass | 10 |
| Cape Girardeau | 13 |
| Pettis | 19 |
| Buchanan | 25 |
| Platte | 8 |
| Lincoln | 2 |
| Christian | 4 |
Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. Missouri has 115 counties total.
This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for Missouri: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.
PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.
What to do with Missouri's data
Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.
Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, this state profile is drawn from PlainEnviro's database of more than 25,000 EPA-tracked facilities, the Safe Drinking Water Information System, and the Superfund National Priorities List, compiled since federal reporting began under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act in October 1986; see our methodology for full source citations and refresh cadence.
Every figure on PlainEnviro is rendered directly from EPA environmental compliance data, no number is typed in by an editor. State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.