TRI Facilities
111
Moderate
NM · EPA TRI · SDWIS · Superfund
According to EPA's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List extracts, this is New Mexico's full public registry profile, toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.
New Mexico vs. every U.S. state
Cumulative TRI-reported release pounds, with this state marked in the national distribution
240M lbs Top 36% higher than 64% of 56 states with TRI reporters
Each bar is a $1M-wide band; taller bars hold more states with TRI reporters. The dashed line and filled bar mark this facility. Hover, focus, or tap a bar for its full count, share, and position.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxics Release Inventory · 2023 reporting year
Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks
What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.
The highlighted point is New Mexico. The vertical axis is the share of tracked water systems with at least one health-based SDWIS record; the horizontal axis is TRI-reported pounds per facility on a logarithmic scale so the full state distribution stays readable. The crosshairs use the portal’s published national benchmark medians.
This matrix compares disclosure rates, not toxicity, exposure, current compliance, or drinking-water safety. A lower position on either axis is not a safety rating; use the underlying facility and water-system records for context.
According to EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts, New Mexico (NM) lists 111 TRI-reporting facilities disclosing 239.8M lbs of toxic releases. The same extracts list 21 Superfund sites and 593 EPA-regulated water systems, of which 445 carry health-based SDWIS violation rows. PlainEnviro's composite environmental health score for New Mexico is 17/100 (grade F), benchmarked against all U.S. states on chemical release intensity, drinking-water health violations, Superfund site burden, and water violation rate. This is a percentile-derived composite from federal disclosure counts, not a clinical health-risk assessment.
A percentile-benchmarked 0–100 composite from 4 EPA federal datasets, with weight redistribution for any unavailable dimension
Benchmarks derived from EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts across all 56 U.S. states and territories
TRI Facilities
111
Moderate
Water Systems
593
Moderate
Superfund Sites
21
Moderate
Total Releases
239.8M lbs
Very high
New Mexico's profile joins three independently maintained EPA programs into one statewide record: the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI, EPCRA Section 313 industrial disclosures), the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS, Safe Drinking Water Act compliance), and the Superfund National Priorities List. Each program uses its own reporting cadence and facility-identification scheme; PlainEnviro joins them by matched facility and system location rather than a shared federal ID, so a site absent from one program is never assumed absent from another. The counts below reflect the portal's rebuild as of August 2026.
Activity clusters in counties such as Bernalillo, Rio Arriba, Sandoval, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence. Monitoring and reporting violations are not included in the SDWIS counts shown here.
Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.
Release-over-release change
Same facilities, both years
+46.9%
87 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
+45.2%
79.8 million lb → 115.9 million lb, every facility that filed
Between the two reporting years, 3 facilities filed for the first time and 8 stopped filing. Facilities entering or leaving the inventory are excluded from the same-facility comparison above.
| Water System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| CAMINO REAL REGIONAL UTILITY AUTHORITY | 19,466 | 260 |
| LORDSBURG WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM | 3,298 | 244 |
| MIAMI WATER USERS ASSOCIATION | 135 | 210 |
| SPRINGER WATER SYSTEM | 1,170 | 197 |
| FRENCH MDWCA/SWA | 209 | 150 |
| PHILMONT BOY SCOUT RANCH - HEADQUARTERS | 2,000 | 150 |
| CIMARRON WATER SYSTEM | 1,260 | 149 |
| LAS VEGAS (CITY OF) | 14,530 | 144 |
| BELEN WATER SYSTEM | 10,830 | 120 |
| GLEN ACRES WATER COOP | 180 | 120 |
| JEMEZ SPRINGS DWUA | 1,385 | 110 |
| TERRELLS MOBILE HOME PARK | 60 | 109 |
| LEISURE MOUNTAIN MHP | 161 | 108 |
| PAAKWEREE VILLAGE WATER CO-OP ASSOC, INC | 117 | 104 |
| SAN YSIDRO WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM | 166 | 102 |
| SANTA CRUZ WATER ASSOCIATION | 394 | 98 |
| DESERT SKY MOUNTAIN WATER COOPERATIVE | 177 | 95 |
| CASSANDRA WATER SYSTEM | 34 | 88 |
| LA UNION MDS & WA | 1,177 | 84 |
| NAVAJO DAM DOMESTIC WATER CONSUMERS INC | 545 | 80 |
| Site Name | Status | HRS Score |
|---|---|---|
| AT & SF (Clovis) | Deleted NPL Site | 33.62 |
| AT&SF (Albuquerque) | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Cal West Metals (USSBA) | Deleted NPL Site | 59.37 |
| Carlisle Village Cleaners | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Chevron Questa Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Cimarron Mining Corp. | Deleted NPL Site | 38.93 |
| Cleveland Mill | Deleted NPL Site | 40.37 |
| Eagle Picher Carefree Battery | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Fruit Avenue Plume | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Grants Chlorinated Solvents Plume | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Griggs & Walnut Ground Water Plume | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Homestake Mining Co. | NPL Site | 34.21 |
| Jackpile-Paguate Uranium Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Lea and West Second Street | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI) | NPL Site | 39.37 |
| McGaffey and Main Groundwater Plume | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| North Railroad Avenue Plume | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Pagano Salvage | Deleted NPL Site | 35.57 |
| Prewitt Abandoned Refinery | NPL Site | 44.24 |
| South Valley | NPL Site | 0.00 |
| United Nuclear Corp. | NPL Site | 30.36 |
| County | Facilities |
|---|---|
| Bernalillo | 34 |
| Rio Arriba | 0 |
| Sandoval | 4 |
| Doña Ana | 0 |
| Taos | 0 |
| Santa Fe | 0 |
| Otero | 2 |
| San Juan | 13 |
| Mckinley | 3 |
| Eddy | 17 |
| San Miguel | 0 |
| Lea | 15 |
| Cibola | 0 |
| Lincoln | 0 |
| Chaves | 2 |
| Grant | 2 |
| Mora | 0 |
| Colfax | 0 |
| Socorro | 0 |
| Torrance | 0 |
Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. New Mexico has 34 counties total.
This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for New Mexico: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.
PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.
What to do with New Mexico's data
Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.
Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.
Use and verify this record
New Mexico's profile brings together EPA release, drinking-water, and Superfund records. It reports the underlying programs without making a health or environmental-risk determination.
State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. The methodology records the joins, definitions, and refresh cadence for each program.
PlainEnviro renders public EPA records directly from its data pipeline; no figure on this page is typed in by an editor. See the editorial standards and corrections policy for how source changes and reported errors are handled.