North Sanitary Landfill

Verify at EPA Superfund →
NPL Site

Dayton, OH

North Sanitary Landfill is listed in the EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System with an NPL status of NPL Site and a Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score of 50.00. The site is located in Dayton, OH. Superfund National Priorities List inclusion is the EPA's formal designation that a contaminated site qualifies for long-term federal cleanup authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act.

EPA Superfund records catalog 110 contaminants associated with this site, documented through the remedial investigation process. Physical construction of the cleanup remedy has been completed, EPA designates this milestone as "Construction Complete."

NPL listing does not, by itself, establish a health risk to nearby residents, it triggers federal authority to investigate, score, and remediate. HRS scores of 28.50 or above qualify a site for the NPL; the ranking weighs contaminant toxicity, release pathways, waste quantity, and affected population. For current site conditions and community health guidance, contact the Ohio environmental or health agency and the EPA Regional Superfund office listed on the official site profile.

What is the cleanup status of this Superfund site?

NPL Status
NPL Site
Federal Facility
No
Construction Complete
Yes
HRS Score
50.00
Deleted from NPL
No

Contaminants

Contaminant Media
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE Groundwater
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE Groundwater
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE Landfill Gas
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE Groundwater
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE Groundwater
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Free-phase NAPL
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Landfill Gas
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Solid Waste
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE Groundwater
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE Groundwater
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE Groundwater
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE Groundwater
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE Groundwater
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Free-phase NAPL
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Landfill Gas
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Solid Waste
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE Groundwater
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE Solid Waste
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID Groundwater
2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPANOIC ACID Groundwater
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE Free-phase NAPL
ALUMINUM Solid Waste
ANTIMONY Groundwater
AROCLOR 1016 Groundwater
AROCLOR 1221 Groundwater
AROCLOR 1232 Groundwater
AROCLOR 1242 Free-phase NAPL
AROCLOR 1242 Groundwater
AROCLOR 1248 Free-phase NAPL
AROCLOR 1248 Groundwater
AROCLOR 1254 Free-phase NAPL
AROCLOR 1254 Groundwater
AROCLOR 1254 Leachate
AROCLOR 1260 Free-phase NAPL
AROCLOR 1260 Groundwater
ARSENIC Groundwater
ATRAZINE Groundwater
BARIUM Groundwater
BENZENE Free-phase NAPL
BENZENE Groundwater
BENZENE Landfill Gas
BENZENE Solid Waste
BENZO[A]PYRENE Groundwater
BERYLLIUM Groundwater
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE Groundwater
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE Groundwater
BROMOFORM Groundwater
CADMIUM Groundwater
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Groundwater
CHLORDANE Groundwater
CHLOROBENZENE Groundwater
CHLOROBENZENE Landfill Gas
CHLOROBENZENE Solid Waste
CHLOROETHENE (VINYL CHLORIDE) Free-phase NAPL
CHLOROETHENE (VINYL CHLORIDE) Groundwater
CHLOROETHENE (VINYL CHLORIDE) Landfill Gas
CHLOROETHENE (VINYL CHLORIDE) Solid Waste
CHLOROFORM Groundwater
CHROMIUM Groundwater
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Free-phase NAPL
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Groundwater
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Landfill Gas
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Leachate
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Solid Waste
COPPER Groundwater
CYANIDE Groundwater
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Groundwater
DICHLOROMETHANE (METHYLENE CHLORIDE) Groundwater
DICHLOROMETHANE (METHYLENE CHLORIDE) Landfill Gas
ENDRIN Groundwater
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE Groundwater
ENDRIN KETONE Groundwater
ETHYLBENZENE Free-phase NAPL
ETHYLBENZENE Groundwater
ETHYLBENZENE Landfill Gas
ETHYLBENZENE Solid Waste
GAMMA-HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE (LINDANE) Groundwater
HEPTACHLOR Groundwater
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE Groundwater
HEXACHLOROBENZENE Groundwater
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE Groundwater
LEAD Groundwater
LEAD Solid Waste
MANGANESE Solid Waste
MERCURY Groundwater
METHOXYCHLOR Groundwater
NITRATE Groundwater
NITRITE Groundwater
PENTACHLOROPHENOL Groundwater
SELENIUM Groundwater
STYRENE Groundwater
TETRACHLOROETHENE Groundwater
TETRACHLOROETHENE Landfill Gas
TETRACHLOROETHENE Solid Waste
THALLIUM Groundwater
TOLUENE Free-phase NAPL
TOLUENE Groundwater
TOLUENE Landfill Gas
TOLUENE Solid Waste
TOXAPHENE Groundwater
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE Groundwater
TRICHLOROETHENE Free-phase NAPL
TRICHLOROETHENE Groundwater
TRICHLOROETHENE Landfill Gas
TRICHLOROETHENE Solid Waste
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE Landfill Gas
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS) Free-phase NAPL
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS) Groundwater
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS) Landfill Gas
XYLENE (MIXED ISOMERS) Solid Waste

Location

City
Dayton
State
Coordinates
39.7861, -84.1525

Other Superfund Sites in Ohio

Site Name Status HRS Score
Air Force Plant 85 Proposed NPL Site 50.00
Allied Chemical & Ironton Coke NPL Site 47.05
Alsco Anaconda Deleted NPL Site 42.94
Arcanum Iron & Metal Deleted NPL Site 62.26
Armco Inc., Hamilton Plant Proposed NPL Site 69.34
Behr Dayton Thermal System VOC Plume NPL Site 50.00
Big D Campground NPL Site 30.77
Bowers Landfill Deleted NPL Site 50.49
Buckeye Reclamation Deleted NPL Site 35.10
Chem-Dyne NPL Site -

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the North Sanitary Landfill Superfund site?
North Sanitary Landfill is an active National Priorities List (NPL) Superfund site located in Dayton, OH. It has a Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score of 50.00. Superfund sites are contaminated locations identified by the EPA for long-term cleanup.
Is North Sanitary Landfill dangerous to live near?
The presence of a site on the EPA National Priorities List does not by itself indicate an immediate health risk to nearby residents. EPA evaluates sites through a comprehensive process including remedial investigation and risk assessment. Construction of the cleanup remedy has been completed at this site. For site-specific health questions, contact your state environmental or health agency.
What is the HRS score for North Sanitary Landfill?
North Sanitary Landfill has a Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score of 50.00. The HRS is the EPA's principal mechanism for evaluating Superfund sites, scores of 28.50 or greater qualify for the NPL. Higher scores indicate greater potential risk based on toxicity, waste quantity, release likelihood, and affected population.
What contaminants are at the North Sanitary Landfill site?
The EPA has identified 110 contaminants at North Sanitary Landfill. Contaminant data is maintained in the EPA's Superfund database and is based on site investigations conducted during the remedial process.
What is the cleanup status of North Sanitary Landfill?
North Sanitary Landfill is currently NPL Site on the National Priorities List. Construction of the cleanup remedy has been completed. The EPA Superfund cleanup process includes phases from preliminary assessment through post-construction completion.

About Superfund

The National Priorities List (NPL) is the list of sites of national priority among the known releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants throughout the United States. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation.

The Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score is the principal mechanism the EPA uses to evaluate sites for placement on the NPL. Sites with an HRS score of 28.50 or greater are eligible for the NPL. Higher scores indicate greater potential risk.

The EPA's Superfund cleanup process typically follows these phases: preliminary assessment, site inspection, NPL listing, remedial investigation/feasibility study, remedy selection, remedial design/action, construction completion, post-construction completion, and NPL deletion. Some sites remain on the NPL for decades.

PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. The presence of a site on the NPL does not by itself indicate an immediate health risk to nearby residents. For site-specific health questions, consult your local environmental or health agency.

Related

Data sourced from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro Editorial