GREENFIELD COUNTY WD
PWSID: CA1510024 · Bakersfield, CA · Serves 11,590 people
According to EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), GREENFIELD COUNTY WD (PWSID CA1510024) in Bakersfield, CA is listed as a CWS water system covering about 11,590 people. The same extract lists 74 health-based violation records spanning 2006-2019. Those 74 health-based rows for GREENFIELD COUNTY WD cover contaminants such as Arsenic, Coliform (TCR), Revised Total Coliform Rule; they remain historical EPA registry entries, not a current compliance or drinkability score.
GREENFIELD COUNTY WD has 74 health-based violation records in this historical extract. Monitoring and reporting records are not included.
PlainEnviro's health-based SDWIS extract covers monitoring and reporting violations only -- it does not include unresolved enforcement actions in progress or corrective steps a utility has taken since the extract date. 3 distinct EPA contaminant codes appear in this system's record, including Arsenic, Coliform (TCR), Revised Total Coliform Rule. Recorded violations span 2006–2019. Day-to-day primacy enforcement for this system runs through the California drinking-water program, not EPA directly.
A historical health-based record does not necessarily describe current water quality or compliance. The most authoritative current source is the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report. For enforcement history and corrective-action orders, consult EPA ECHO and the California state drinking-water program's public portal.
System Details
- EPA ID (PWSID)
- CA1510024
- System Type
- CWS
- Water Source
- Groundwater
- Location
- Bakersfield, CA
- Population Served
- 11,590
- Health Violations
- Yes (74)
What contaminants are in this water system?
| Contaminant | Violations | Health-Based |
|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 68 | 68 |
| Coliform (TCR) | 4 | 4 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | 2 | 2 |
Violation History (74)
| Contaminant | Health | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2019 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2019 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2018 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2017 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Yes | Apr 1, 2017 |
| Revised Total Coliform Rule | Yes | Apr 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2017 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2016 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2015 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2014 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2013 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2012 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | May 1, 2012 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | May 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2012 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2011 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2011 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2010 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jul 1, 2010 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2010 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Apr 1, 2010 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2010 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Jan 1, 2010 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2009 |
| Arsenic | Yes | Oct 1, 2009 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Apr 1, 2006 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Apr 1, 2006 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does EPA SDWIS list for GREENFIELD COUNTY WD?
How many people does GREENFIELD COUNTY WD serve?
What violations does GREENFIELD COUNTY WD have?
What contaminants have been found in GREENFIELD COUNTY WD water?
Compare beyond California
Nationwide peers by violations & population served
Cross-state SDWIS systems nearest GREENFIELD COUNTY WD on cumulative violation count (74) and EPA-reported population served (11,590). Violation-count peers include LEXINGTON, SOUTH TOLEDO BEND WATER DISTRICT, BACKWOOD VILLAGE WATER SYSTEM. Population peers include AVON WATER CO, THE CAPE MASTER SYSTEM, FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 142.
Similar violation count
Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by SDWIS violations on record.
Similar population served
Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ gate).
Nearby Water Systems
Explore More
About This Data
GREENFIELD COUNTY WD (CA1510024) is drawn from EPA SDWIS. Nearby county systems in this extract include DELANO, CITY OF; OILDALE MWC; TEJON CASTAC WD - I5 & LAVAL RD; VAUGHN WC INC. Health-based rows (74 MCL/TT) are historical registry state, not a current drinkability score.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SDWIS Federal Reporting Services
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.