RED RIVER COUNTY WSC

PWSID: TX1940008 · Clarksville, TX · Serves 7,989 people

According to EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), RED RIVER COUNTY WSC (PWSID TX1940008) in Clarksville, TX is listed as a CWS water system covering about 7,989 people. The same extract lists 23 health-based violation records spanning 2014-2017. Those 23 health-based rows for RED RIVER COUNTY WSC cover contaminants such as TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5); they remain historical EPA registry entries, not a current compliance or drinkability score.

View saved records
Health-Based Records

RED RIVER COUNTY WSC has 23 health-based violation records in this historical extract. Monitoring and reporting records are not included.

Population Served
7,989
Health-Based Violation Records
23
Distinct Contaminant Codes
2
Source Type
Groundwater

PlainEnviro's health-based SDWIS extract covers monitoring and reporting violations only -- it does not include unresolved enforcement actions in progress or corrective steps a utility has taken since the extract date. 2 distinct EPA contaminant codes appear in this system's record, including TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). Recorded violations span 2014–2017. Day-to-day primacy enforcement for this system runs through the Texas drinking-water program, not EPA directly.

A historical health-based record does not necessarily describe current water quality or compliance. The most authoritative current source is the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report. For enforcement history and corrective-action orders, consult EPA ECHO and the Texas state drinking-water program's public portal.

System Details

EPA ID (PWSID)
TX1940008
System Type
CWS
Water Source
Groundwater
Location
Clarksville, TX
Population Served
7,989
Health Violations
Yes (23)

What contaminants are in this water system?

Contaminant Violations Health-Based
TTHM 15 15
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) 8 8

Violation History (23)

Contaminant Health Date
TTHM Yes Jul 1, 2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Jul 1, 2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Apr 1, 2017
TTHM Yes Apr 1, 2017
TTHM Yes Jan 1, 2017
TTHM Yes Oct 1, 2016
TTHM Yes Jul 1, 2016
TTHM Yes Apr 1, 2016
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Apr 1, 2016
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Jan 1, 2016
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Jan 1, 2016
TTHM Yes Jan 1, 2016
TTHM Yes Jan 1, 2016
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Oct 1, 2015
TTHM Yes Oct 1, 2015
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Jul 1, 2015
TTHM Yes Jul 1, 2015
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Yes Apr 1, 2015
TTHM Yes Apr 1, 2015
TTHM Yes Jan 1, 2015
TTHM Yes Oct 1, 2014
TTHM Yes Jul 1, 2014
TTHM Yes Apr 1, 2014

Frequently Asked Questions

What does EPA SDWIS list for RED RIVER COUNTY WSC?
RED RIVER COUNTY WSC has 23 health-based violation records in this historical extract. Monitoring and reporting records are not included. The system uses groundwater water as its source.
How many people does RED RIVER COUNTY WSC serve?
RED RIVER COUNTY WSC serves 7,989 people in Clarksville, TX. It is classified as a CWS water system.
What violations does RED RIVER COUNTY WSC have?
RED RIVER COUNTY WSC has 23 health-based violation records in PlainEnviro's extract spanning 2014–2017. Monitoring and reporting records are not included.
What contaminants have been found in RED RIVER COUNTY WSC water?
Violations have been recorded for 2 contaminants. The most frequent: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).

Compare beyond Texas

Nationwide peers by violations & population served

Cross-state SDWIS systems nearest RED RIVER COUNTY WSC on cumulative violation count (23) and EPA-reported population served (7,989). Violation-count peers include BETHEL-CITY S/D WATER, HOLLY GROVE WATERWORKS, DELIGHT WATERWORKS. Population peers include NORTH FRANKLIN WATER WORKS, WAGONER, BENTON WATER & SEWER.

About This Data

RED RIVER COUNTY WSC (TX1940008) is drawn from EPA SDWIS. Nearby county systems in this extract include 410 WATER SUPPLY; CITY OF CLARKSVILLE; CITY OF BOGATA; CITY OF DETROIT. Health-based rows (23 MCL/TT) are historical registry state, not a current drinkability score.

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SDWIS Federal Reporting Services

Related