Griffith Rubber Mills
3 facilities · 2 states · 38.6K lbs total releases
According to the EPA Toxics Release Inventory, Griffith Rubber Mills is the reported parent of 3 Form R facilities across 2 states, disclosing 38.6K lbs of toxic releases. 3 chemicals are reported; none carry a carcinogen classification in this extract. The heaviest-reporting state by release volume is Indiana (28.3K lbs). Those TRI figures remain self-reported disclosure pounds across Griffith Rubber Mills's multi-state Form R set, not a measured public-health risk score.
Release-over-release change
What changed for Griffith Rubber Mills: EPA TRI 2023 reporting year
Same facilities, both years
-1.5%
3 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
-1.5%
9.5 thousand lb → 9.3 thousand lb, every facility that filed
- Griffith Rubber Mills's total reported releases fell from 9.5 thousand lb in 2022 to 9.3 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Griffith Rubber Mills's off-site transfers fell from 9.5 thousand lb in 2022 to 9.3 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
TRI parent disclosure trail
Read Griffith Rubber Mills from filing to facility
Largest Form R sites under this parent: Griffith Rubber Mills of Garrett Inc; Griffith Rubber Mills; Griffith Rubber Mills - Lee St. Neighbor parents on the disclosure ladder: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc; US Steel Corp. Largest disclosed chemicals by pounds: Zinc compounds. Heaviest-reporting states in this extract: Indiana; Oregon. Industry labels on the parent rollup: Plastics and Rubber. Start from those named sites and neighbors rather than a generic parent blurb; pounds stay disclosure, not risk.
Largest Form R sites under this parent: Griffith Rubber Mills of Garrett Inc; Griffith Rubber Mills; Griffith Rubber Mills - Lee St. Neighbor parents on the disclosure ladder: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc; US Steel Corp. Largest disclosed chemicals by pounds: Zinc compounds. Heaviest-reporting states in this extract: Indiana; Oregon. Industry labels on the parent rollup: Plastics and Rubber.
Griffith Rubber Mills ranks #2,135 of 4,988 slug-merged TRI parents, a smaller disclosed-volume parent relative to the national Form R parent set. Griffith Rubber Mills files across 2 states, a regional parent portfolio rather than a single-state discloser. Griffith Rubber Mills's disclosed pounds are spread across 3 facilities, no single site dominates the parent total in this extract.
Parent aggregation for Griffith Rubber Mills follows facility-reported names. Compare the named neighbors (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc; US Steel Corp) before treating rank as a hazard score; TRI stays self-reported and unweighted by toxicity.
Where Griffith Rubber Mills sits among TRI parents
Griffith Rubber Mills sits on a disclosure ladder beside Cleveland-Cliffs Inc and US Steel Corp. Open those parents for a different facility count, state span, and chemical mix.
Higher disclosed volume
- Cleveland-Cliffs Inc · rank #2,133 · 131.7M lbs
- US Steel Corp · rank #2,134 · 79.2M lbs
Largest chemicals disclosed by Griffith Rubber Mills
Zinc compounds lead the Form R pound rollup for this parent, including filings such as Griffith Rubber Mills of Garrett Inc. Pound totals, not toxicity-weighted risk.
| Chemical | Disclosed lbs |
|---|---|
| Zinc compounds | 38.6K lbs |
Where does this company operate?
| State | Facilities | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana | 2 | 28.3K lbs |
| Oregon | 1 | 10.4K lbs |
Facilities (3)
| Facility | Releases |
|---|---|
| Griffith Rubber Mills of Garrett Inc Garrett, IN | 22.7K lbs |
| Griffith Rubber Mills Portland, OR | 10.4K lbs |
| Griffith Rubber Mills - Lee St Garrett, IN | 5.6K lbs |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much pollution does Griffith Rubber Mills release?
How many facilities does Griffith Rubber Mills operate?
What industries and chemicals show up for Griffith Rubber Mills?
Compare beyond the release ladder
Nationwide peers by disclosed pounds & facility count
Cross-portfolio TRI parents nearest Griffith Rubber Mills on total disclosed release pounds (38.6K lbs) and reporting facility count (3). Release-volume peers include Exxonmobil Oil Corp, Vsp Global, Alloy Holdings LLC. Facility-count peers include A-Gas US Holdings Inc, Abb Holdings Inc, Adams Resources & Energy Inc. Neighborhoods are forced disjoint so each axis surfaces a different set of parents.
Similar disclosed release pounds
Nearest parents (≥3 facilities, ≥10k lbs) by absolute TRI disclosed pounds, not rank-adjacent ladder neighbors.
Similar facility count
Nearest parents by reporting-site count (deduped against the release-pound neighborhood).
About This Data
EPA TRI parent totals cover all media. This extract's heaviest states for the parent are Indiana, Oregon; facility-reported names can vary across subsidiaries.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, TRI Basic Data Files
What to do with Griffith Rubber Mills's TRI parent record
From Griffith Rubber Mills, open Griffith Rubber Mills of Garrett Inc or compare against Cleveland-Cliffs Inc rather than reading rank alone.
- Open the largest Form R site for Griffith Rubber Mills (Griffith Rubber Mills of Garrett Inc in IN). Largest facility
- Compare against US Steel Corp, the next-higher disclosed-volume parent. Higher-volume parent
- Browse the full parent release ranking to see where Griffith Rubber Mills sits among all slug-merged TRI parents. All parent companies
Rank and peers (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc, US Steel Corp) are disclosure volume only, not toxicity-weighted risk or enforcement status.
Use and verify this record
Griffith Rubber Mills's record groups disclosed TRI parent-company filings so readers can compare reporting context without treating the total as a measure of risk.
Company release figures are computed directly from EPA Toxic Release Inventory data; source names and the record-linking method are documented in the methodology.
Primary sources
- EPA Toxics Release Inventory Basic Data Files - annual facility-level chemical-release disclosures
PlainEnviro renders public EPA records directly from its data pipeline; no figure on this page is typed in by an editor. See the editorial standards and corrections policy for how source changes and reported errors are handled.