Texas Molecular LP
1 facility · 1 state · 63.0M lbs total releases
According to the EPA Toxics Release Inventory, Texas Molecular LP is the reported parent of 1 Form R facility across 1 state, disclosing 63.0M lbs of toxic releases. 25 of 76 reported chemicals carry a carcinogen classification in the TRI extract. The heaviest-reporting state by release volume is Texas (63.0M lbs). Those TRI figures remain self-reported disclosure pounds for Texas Molecular LP, including carcinogen-flagged substances, not a measured public-health risk score.
Release-over-release change
What changed for Texas Molecular LP: EPA TRI 2023 reporting year
Same facilities, both years
-6.1%
1 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
-6.1%
14.5 million lb → 13.6 million lb, every facility that filed
- Texas Molecular LP's total reported releases fell from 14.5 million lb in 2022 to 13.6 million lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Texas Molecular LP's off-site transfers rose from 6.8 thousand lb in 2022 to 10.7 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Texas Molecular LP's land releases fell from 14.5 million lb in 2022 to 13.6 million lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Texas Molecular LP's chemicals reported fell from 57 in 2022 to 54 in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
TRI parent disclosure trail
Read Texas Molecular LP from filing to facility
Texas Molecular LP maps to a single Form R site (Tm Deer Park Services LP) in Texas. Open that filing for the chemical mix; pounds stay disclosure, not risk.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, TRI Basic Data Files Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) · August 2026
Largest Form R sites under this parent: Tm Deer Park Services LP. Neighbor parents on the disclosure ladder: Targa Resources Corp; Ineos US I Inc; Valero Energy Corp; Republic Services Inc. Largest disclosed chemicals by pounds: Methanol; N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone; Cyanide compounds; Zinc compounds; Diethanolamine. Heaviest-reporting states in this extract: Texas. Industry labels on the parent rollup: Hazardous Waste.
Texas Molecular LP ranks #33 of 4,988 slug-merged TRI parents by disclosed release pounds, mid-to-upper among parents, not a top-25 volume name. Texas Molecular LP's TRI Form R footprint is concentrated in a single state (Texas), so statewide context matters more than a multi-state portfolio read. This parent maps to a single reporting facility (Tm Deer Park Services LP), so the company total and that site's Form R are the same disclosure.
Parent aggregation for Texas Molecular LP follows facility-reported names. Compare the named neighbors (Targa Resources Corp; Ineos US I Inc; Valero Energy Corp) before treating rank as a hazard score; TRI stays self-reported and unweighted by toxicity.
Where Texas Molecular LP sits among TRI parents
Texas Molecular LP sits on a disclosure ladder beside Targa Resources Corp and Ineos US I Inc and Valero Energy Corp and Republic Services Inc. Open those parents for a different facility count, state span, and chemical mix.
Higher disclosed volume
- Targa Resources Corp · rank #31 · 105.5M lbs
- Ineos US I Inc · rank #32 · 94.2M lbs
Lower disclosed volume
- Valero Energy Corp · rank #34 · 35.2M lbs
- Republic Services Inc · rank #35 · 34.6M lbs
Largest chemicals disclosed by Texas Molecular LP
Methanol; N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone; Cyanide compounds; Zinc compounds; Diethanolamine lead the Form R pound rollup for this parent, including filings such as Tm Deer Park Services LP. Pound totals, not toxicity-weighted risk.
| Chemical | Disclosed lbs |
|---|---|
| Methanol | 13.1M lbs |
| N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone | 10.6M lbs |
| Cyanide compounds | 8.0M lbs |
| Zinc compounds | 4.7M lbs |
| Diethanolamine | 4.4M lbs |
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Releases |
|---|---|
| Tm Deer Park Services LP Deer Park, TX | 63.0M lbs |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much pollution does Texas Molecular LP release?
How many facilities does Texas Molecular LP operate?
What industries and chemicals show up for Texas Molecular LP?
Does Texas Molecular LP release carcinogens?
Compare beyond the release ladder
Nationwide peers by disclosed pounds & facility count
Cross-portfolio TRI parents nearest Texas Molecular LP on total disclosed release pounds (63.0M lbs) and reporting facility count (1). Release-volume peers include Dyno Nobel Inc, Koch Industries Inc, Smurfit Westrock U.S. Holding Co. Neighborhoods are forced disjoint so each axis surfaces a different set of parents.
Similar disclosed release pounds
Nearest parents (≥3 facilities, ≥10k lbs) by absolute TRI disclosed pounds, not rank-adjacent ladder neighbors.
About This Data
EPA TRI parent totals cover all media. This extract's heaviest states for the parent are Texas; facility-reported names can vary across subsidiaries.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, TRI Basic Data Files
What to do with Texas Molecular LP's TRI parent record
From Texas Molecular LP, open Tm Deer Park Services LP or compare against Targa Resources Corp rather than reading rank alone.
- Open the largest Form R site for Texas Molecular LP (Tm Deer Park Services LP in TX). Largest facility
- Compare against Ineos US I Inc, the next-higher disclosed-volume parent. Higher-volume parent
- Browse the full parent release ranking to see where Texas Molecular LP sits among all slug-merged TRI parents. All parent companies
Rank and peers (Targa Resources Corp, Ineos US I Inc) are disclosure volume only, not toxicity-weighted risk or enforcement status.
Use and verify this record
Texas Molecular LP's record groups disclosed TRI parent-company filings so readers can compare reporting context without treating the total as a measure of risk.
Company release figures are computed directly from EPA Toxic Release Inventory data; source names and the record-linking method are documented in the methodology.
Primary sources
- EPA Toxics Release Inventory Basic Data Files - annual facility-level chemical-release disclosures
PlainEnviro renders public EPA records directly from its data pipeline; no figure on this page is typed in by an editor. See the editorial standards and corrections policy for how source changes and reported errors are handled.