Iron, UT

Moderate Risk (39/100)

Transparent derived index from EPA TRI / SDWIS / Superfund extracts: not an official EPA rating. Fixed caps: facilities ≤25 pts (50+ = max), log10 releases ≤25 pts, Superfund ≤25 pts (5/site), health-violation systems ≤15 pts (3/system), high-chemical facilities ≤10 pts. Bands: High ≥60, Moderate ≥30. See methodology.

Environmental data for Iron in Utah · Population: 60,201

TRI sites such as Bmca Cedar City LLC (bmca); American Pacific Corp Utah Operations; Western Quality Foods LLC; SDWIS systems such as CEDAR CITY WATERWORKS; ENOCH CITY WATER SYSTEM; CEDAR VALLEY WATER CONSERVANCY anchor Iron, UT's EPA extract. Derived burden score 39/100 (Moderate Risk) uses fixed national caps on density, log release volume, Superfund count, and health-flagged systems - not an official EPA rating.

Health-flagged SDWIS rows in Iron include CEDAR CITY WATERWORKS; ENOCH CITY WATER SYSTEM; CEDAR VALLEY WATER CONSERVANCY, while Bmca Cedar City LLC (bmca) leads reported TRI pounds among local Form R filers. AQS median AQI 43 / peak 100 in 2024.

Burden score 39/100 (Moderate Risk) is the only weighted composite on this page. The tables below list every TRI facility, SDWIS system, and Superfund site EPA has on record for Iron -- not just the names called out above -- reproducing the disclosure history as filed, not a current-safety verdict. Extract current as of 2026-08-25.

Release-over-release change

What changed for Iron, UT: EPA TRI 2023 reporting year

2022 → 2023

Same facilities, both years

-46.6%

5 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023

Whole inventory

-46.5%

388.2 thousand lb → 207.5 thousand lb, every facility that filed

Between the two reporting years, 1 facility filed for the first time and 0 stopped filing. Facilities entering or leaving the inventory are excluded from the same-facility comparison above.

  • Iron, UT's total reported releases fell from 388.2 thousand lb in 2022 to 207.5 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
  • Iron, UT's off-site transfers fell from 387.7 thousand lb in 2022 to 206.8 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
  • Iron, UT's air releases rose from 490 lb in 2022 to 644 lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
  • Iron, UT's chemicals reported fell from 13 in 2022 to 10 in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
County population (Census ACS)
60,201
TRI Facilities
6
Water Systems
29
Superfund Sites
0
Total Releases
1.2M lbs

Air Quality History (2020–2024)

EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) data showing how many days per year fall into each air quality category.

Year Good Moderate Unhealthy (SG) Max AQI
2024 303 (83%) 62 0 100
2023 309 (85%) 55 1 103
2022 309 (85%) 56 0 80
2021 286 (78%) 75 3 176
2020 312 (85%) 54 0 88
2024 Good Air Quality: 83% of days
Median AQI: 43

Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County AQI categories: Good (0-50), Moderate (51-100), Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (101-150), Unhealthy (151-200), Very Unhealthy (201-300), Hazardous (301+)

For real-time air quality readings and pollutant breakdowns in Utah, see the EPA's AirNow.gov.

Water Systems (29)

System System pop (SDWIS) Violations
CEDAR CITY WATERWORKS 39,670 1
ENOCH CITY WATER SYSTEM 6,500 5
CEDAR VALLEY WATER CONSERVANCY 3,995 2
PAROWAN CITY WATER SYSTEM 3,000 0
BRIAN HEAD TOWN WATER SYSTEM 1,038 2
MID VALLEY ESTATES 753 6
PARAGONAH TOWN WATER SYSTEM 600 0
BUENA VISTA COMMUNITY 440 3
KANARRAVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM 355 0
NEW CASTLE WATER COMPANY 350 2
MEADOWS RANCH 350 0
HARMONY FARMS WATER USERS 314 5
RAINBOW RANCHOS 291 0
TWIN OAKS LOCAL DISTRICT 270 2
FLYING L SUBDIVISION 220 0
SPRING CREEK WATER USERS 204 0
SUMMIT CULINARY WATER 185 3
MONTE VISTA COMMUNITY WATER CO 150 1
MOUNTAIN VIEW SSD 120 0
CHEKSHANI CLIFFS HOA 120 0
CEDAR HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION 100 0
HARMONY MTN RANCHES 80 2
IRONTOWN 75 25
BUMBLEBEE WATER SYSTEM 75 1
OLD MEADOWS WATER CO 74 7
ESCALANTE VALLEY HOUSING 51 4
PLEASANT HILLS WATER COMPANY 31 0
ALLARD RANCH WATER CO 30 0
FOOTHILL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION 28 13

TRI Facilities (6)

# Facility Total Releases
1 Bmca Cedar City LLC (bmca) 786.4K lbs
2 American Pacific Corp Utah Operations 408.4K lbs
3 Western Quality Foods LLC 26.4K lbs
4 Staker & Parson- Cedar City Facility 17 lbs
5 Sunroc Corp - Cedar City 0 lbs
6 Mueller Copper Tube West Co. 0 lbs

Cities in Iron (8)

Cedar City
6 facilities · 20 water
Parowan
0 facilities · 2 water
Summit
0 facilities · 2 water
Beryl
0 facilities · 1 water
Brian Head
0 facilities · 1 water
Kanarraville
0 facilities · 1 water
Newcastle
0 facilities · 1 water
Paragonah
0 facilities · 1 water

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the environmental risk level in Iron, Utah?
Iron, UT has an environmental risk score of 39/100 (Moderate Risk), based on 6 TRI facilities, 0 Superfund sites, and 29 water systems on record. 17 water systems have health-based violations. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL.
Are there Superfund sites in Iron?
No Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) sites are currently registered in Iron, UT in the EPA database.
How many toxic release facilities are in Iron?
Iron, UT has 6 TRI-reporting facilities on record with the EPA Toxic Release Inventory, with a combined total of 1.2M lbs in reported toxic releases. TRI facilities self-report annual chemical release data to the EPA.
What is the air quality in Iron?
In 2024, Iron, UT recorded a median AQI of 43 and a peak AQI of 100. 83% of monitored days had "Good" air quality (AQI 0–50). Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County.
Is the drinking water safe in Iron?
Iron, UT has 29 EPA-regulated water systems. 17 systems have reported health-based violations (MCL exceedances). A past violation does not necessarily mean water is currently unsafe. For current water quality, contact your local water utility. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental agencies cover Iron?
Environmental compliance in Iron, Utah is overseen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the federal level and the Utah state environmental agency. Facilities report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory, water systems are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and contaminated sites are managed under the Superfund program. Contact your state environmental agency for local concerns.

What does this county environmental profile show?

This county environmental profile rolls up EPA Toxics Release Inventory facility reports, Safe Drinking Water Information System public-water-system filings, and Superfund National Priorities List sites for the county boundary defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Facility counts reflect facilities with a reporting address inside the county, not where downstream environmental effects may be observed. Population figures are from the most recent Census ACS 5-year estimate. The county detail page is updated whenever the upstream EPA programs publish revised data; see the methodology page for the documented ingest cadence and the editorial choices governing how aggregations are computed.

Related

Data sourced from U.S. EPA environmental datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro