2023 EPA TRI data 246 facilities 559 water systems

Utah Environmental Profile

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List, this is Utah's (UT) full public environmental-compliance record - toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.

UT regulatory profile by statute

Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks

records

What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.

Source EPA SDWIS / Superfund

TRI Facilities

246

EPCRA Section 313 reporters

Water Systems

559

SDWIS regulated

Superfund Sites

24

12 active NPL

Total Releases

1058.9M lbs

TRI cumulative disclosure

Compliance Snapshot - UT

Sites with no recorded health violations 65.8%
Sites with at least one open violation 34.2%

Utah consolidates three federal EPA datasets into one statewide environmental profile: 246 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities reporting under EPCRA Section 313, 559 community water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and 24 sites on the Superfund National Priorities List.

TRI facilities in UT have cumulatively disclosed 1058.9M lbs of toxic chemical releases, while SDWIS records show 1,200 total violations across the state's regulated water systems, of which 275 systems carry an active health-based violation (MCL exceedance or treatment-technique failure). Activity clusters in counties such as Salt Lake, Utah, Weber, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence.

Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.

What does this state's environmental record show?

TRI Facilities
246
Water Systems
559
Superfund Sites
24
Total Violations
1,200
Total Releases
1058.9M lbs
Health Violations
275
water systems

Largest Polluters

View all →
# Facility Total Releases
1 Kennecott Utah Copper Mine Concentrators & Power Plant 781.4M lbs
2 Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter & Refinery 135.3M lbs
3 Clean Harbors Grassy Mountain LLC 32.4M lbs
4 US Magnesium LLC 27.7M lbs
5 Energysolutions LLC 15.4M lbs
6 Clean Harbors Aragonite LLC 13.3M lbs
7 Pacificorp Hunter Plant 6.4M lbs
8 Materion Natural Resources Inc Mill 6.0M lbs
9 Nucor Steel - a Div of Nucor Corp 4.3M lbs
10 McWane Ductile-Utah 4.3M lbs
11 Bonanza Power Plant 4.2M lbs
12 Intermountain Power Generating Station 3.1M lbs
13 Western Zirconium 2.9M lbs
14 Pacificorp Energy-Huntington Plant 2.4M lbs
15 Bluebell Gas Plant 1.9M lbs
16 Altamont Gas Plant-Kinder Morgan 1.6M lbs
17 Hexcel Corp 1.6M lbs
18 Hf Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC 1.3M lbs
19 Chevron Products Co - Salt Lake Refinery 1.3M lbs
20 Northrop Grumman Systems Corp - Promontory 1.2M lbs

Water Quality

Systems with Health Violations

Water System Population Violations
BIG PLAINS WATER SSD - CEDAR POINT 232 68
CREEKWOOD PARK WATER SYSTEM 192 42
OAK HAVEN WATER COMPANY 388 34
BATEMANS MOSIDA FARMS 90 29
DUTCH JOHN TOWN WATER SYSTEM 144 28
GREEN HILLS COUNTRY ESTATES 237 26
HINCKLEY TOWN WATER SYSTEM 630 23
NORTH VALLEY RANCHES SUB 78 22
IRONTOWN 75 21
CANYON MEADOWS MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 85 20
DESERET - OASIS SSD 490 18
CORNISH TOWN WATER SYSTEM 275 13
FOOTHILL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION 28 13
HI-COUNTRY ESTATES #1 373 13
PALISADES WATER COMPANY 49 13
BIG PLAINS WATER SSD - APPLE VALLEY 450 13
DIAMOND VALLEY ACRES 1,340 11
MOUNT PLEASANT CITY 4,040 10
COVE WATERWORKS 60 9
OAK CITY WATER SYSTEM 660 9
KEARNS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 56,700 9
TWIN CREEKS SSD 4,640 9
PINE VALLEY IRRIGATION CO 50 9
URIAH HEEPS SPRING WATER SYSTEM 3,550 8
PRICE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 8,867 8
TRAIL CYN RESIDENTS ASSN 62 8
LAKETOWN 380 8
MOUNTAIN MEADOW IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 80 8
CLUFF WARD PIPELINE CO 188 8
PEOA PIPELINE COMPANY 141 8
BRIDGE HOLLOW WATER ASSOCIATION 85 8
NORTH OGDEN CITY 22,000 8
POLE PATCH WATER SYSTEM 80 8
M & J TRAILER HOME COMMUNITY 27 7
OLD MEADOWS WATER CO 74 7
DESERET LAND AND LIVESTOCK 29 7
WOODLAND MUTUAL WATER CO 190 7
PLEASANT GROVE CITY 40,000 7
HUNTSVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM 750 7
PINE RIDGE MOBILE HOME COMMUNITY 490 6
BOTHWELL TOWN WATER SYSTEM 237 6
PARADISE TOWN WATER SYSTEM 1,014 6
EAST CARBON CITY 1,460 6
CLINTON CITY WATER SYSTEM 23,000 6
ANTIMONY TOWN WATER SYSTEM 135 6
SORREL RIVER RANCH WATER 260 6
MID VALLEY ESTATES 753 6
ALTON TOWN WATER SYSTEM 136 6
PETERSON PIPELINE ASSOCIATION 495 6
AUSTIN SSD 135 6
WEBER MEADOWVIEW RANCH 90 6
VIVIAN PARK HOMEOWNERS 365 6
HILDALE - COLORADO CITY 6,100 6
EDEN WATERWORKS SYSTEM 1,350 6
NORDIC MTN WATER COMPANY 570 6
KATHERINE HEIGHTS 415 5
Aneth Community School BIA 192 5
TRENTON TOWN WATER SYSTEM 490 5
GREEN RIVER CITY 910 5
THOMPSON SPECIAL SERVICES DISTRICT 85 5
ENOCH CITY WATER SYSTEM 6,500 5
ELKRIDGE WATER COMPANY 178 5
SOUTH ROBINSON SPRINGS WATER USERS 28 5
PACK CREEK WATER COMPANY 75 5
ROCKLAND RANCH 175 5
SPRING CITY 1,050 5
MARION WATERWORKS CO 380 5
WANSHIP WATER CO. LLC 79 5
WOODENSHOE WATER COMPANY 76 5
SPRING LAKE 475 5
SWISS ALPINE WATER CO 300 5
GUNLOCK SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT 118 5
HARMONY FARMS WATER USERS 314 5
PINE VIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 105 5
Goshute (Lower) 40 4
Goshute (Upper) 40 4
ELWOOD TOWN 1,300 4
CEDAR RIDGE DISTRIBUTION COMPANY 100 4
SUNSET PARK WATER CO 44 4
CLEARFIELD CITY WATER SYSTEM 33,540 4
SOUTH DAVIS WATER DISTRICT 10,565 4
FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY WATER SYSTEM 6,075 4
JOHNSON WATER DISTRICT 1,895 4
FRUITLAND WATER SSD 1,162 4
ESCALANTE VALLEY HOUSING 51 4
GLENDALE TOWN WATER SYSTEM 411 4
MURRAY CITY WATER SYSTEM 38,723 4
HI-COUNTRY NUMBER 2 722 4
BLANDING CITY 3,760 4
CHESTER PARK WATER SYSTEM 152 4
GLENWOOD TOWN WATER SYSTEM 447 4
HOYTSVILLE PIPE WATER CO 440 4
TOOELE CITY WATER SYSTEM 37,100 4
CENTRAL UTAH WCD - ASHLEY VALLEY 0 4
SPRINGVILLE CITY 35,516 4
LINDON CITY 11,900 4
WILDWOOD SUBDIVISION 177 4
SARATOGA SPRINGS CITY 58,000 4
INTERLAKEN TOWN 350 4
LIBERTY PIPELINE COMPANY 1,750 4

Cities with Water Issues

Superfund Sites (24)

Site Name Status HRS Score
700 South 1600 East PCE Plume NPL Site 50.00
Bountiful/Woods Cross 5th South PCE Plume NPL Site 50.00
Davenport and Flagstaff Smelters Deleted NPL Site 32.50
Eureka Mills Deleted NPL Site 50.00
Five Points PCE Plume NPL Site 50.00
Hill Air Force Base NPL Site 49.94
Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery Deleted NPL Site 50.00
International Smelting and Refining Deleted NPL Site 58.31
Jacobs Smelter NPL Site 50.00
Kennecott (North Zone) Proposed NPL Site 59.18
Midvale Slag Deleted NPL Site 42.47
Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE) NPL Site 35.86
Monticello Radioactively Contaminated Properties Deleted NPL Site 35.03
Murray Smelter Proposed NPL Site 86.60
Ogden Defense Depot (DLA) NPL Site 45.10
Petrochem Recycling Corp./Ekotek, Inc. Deleted NPL Site 62.81
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust 2 & 3) NPL Site 54.40
Richardson Flat Tailings Proposed NPL Site 50.23
Rose Park Sludge Pit Deleted NPL Site -
Sharon Steel Corp. (Midvale Tailings) Deleted NPL Site 41.85
Tooele Army Depot (North Area) NPL Site 53.95
U.S. Magnesium NPL Site 59.18
Utah Power & Light/American Barrel Co. NPL Site 37.93
Wasatch Chemical Co. (Lot 6) NPL Site 49.91

Counties (30 total)

Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. Utah has 30 counties total.

Largest Cities

Bingham Canyon
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Magna
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water systems
American Fork
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water systems
Eagle Mountain
Pop: -
2 facilities · 4 water systems
Clearfield
Pop: -
7 facilities · 0 water systems
Riverton
Pop: -
3 facilities · 1 water systems
Dugway
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Clive
Pop: -
2 facilities · 0 water systems
Grantsville
Pop: -
4 facilities · 1 water systems
Uttr
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Draper
Pop: -
2 facilities · 3 water systems
Layton
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water systems
Lindon
Pop: -
4 facilities · 0 water systems
Lehi
Pop: -
4 facilities · 3 water systems
Saratoga Springs
Pop: -
1 facilities · 3 water systems
Salt Lake City
Pop: -
49 facilities · 9 water systems
Midvale
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Morgan
Pop: -
2 facilities · 6 water systems
North Salt Lake
Pop: -
8 facilities · 1 water systems
Hill Afb
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems

Frequently Asked Questions

How many polluting facilities are in Utah?
Utah has 246 facilities that report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). These facilities have collectively reported 1058.9M lbs in total toxic chemical releases. TRI data is self-reported annually by facilities that manufacture, process, or use listed toxic chemicals above threshold amounts.
Does Utah have Superfund sites?
Yes, Utah has 24 sites on the EPA Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). Superfund sites are contaminated locations identified for long-term cleanup under the EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Is the water safe in Utah?
Utah has 559 EPA-regulated water systems. 275 water systems have reported health-based violations (MCL exceedances). A past violation does not necessarily mean water is currently unsafe. For current water quality, contact your local water utility. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental data is available for Utah?
PlainEnviro provides three categories of EPA environmental data for Utah: Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data covering 246 industrial facilities, Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) data for 559 water systems, and Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) data for 24 contaminated sites.
How does Utah compare to other states environmentally?
Utah has 246 TRI facilities with 1058.9M lbs in total releases, 24 Superfund sites, and 1,200 water system violations on record. State-level environmental comparisons depend on many factors including industrial activity, population, and geographic size. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL databases.

About This Data

This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for Utah: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.

PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.

What to do with Utah's data

Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.

  • Check the 246 TRI facilities reporting in Utah for the largest reported releases near a specific county. View facilities
  • 275 water systems in the state have a recorded health-based violation, check if yours is one of them. Check water systems
  • See how Utah compares to other states on releases, water violations, and Superfund sites. State rankings

Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.

Related

Data sourced from U.S. EPA environmental datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro Editorial

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, this state profile is drawn from PlainEnviro's database of more than 25,000 EPA-tracked facilities, the Safe Drinking Water Information System, and the Superfund National Priorities List, compiled since federal reporting began under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act in October 1986; see our methodology for full source citations and refresh cadence.

Every figure on PlainEnviro is rendered directly from EPA environmental compliance data, no number is typed in by an editor. State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.