Neosho, KS
Transparent derived index from EPA TRI / SDWIS / Superfund extracts: not an official EPA rating. Fixed caps: facilities ≤25 pts (50+ = max), log10 releases ≤25 pts, Superfund ≤25 pts (5/site), health-violation systems ≤15 pts (3/system), high-chemical facilities ≤10 pts. Bands: High ≥60, Moderate ≥30. See methodology.
Environmental data for Neosho in Kansas · Population: 15,715
TRI sites such as Ash Grove Cement Co; Hi-Lo Industries Inc; Hbd/thermoid Inc; SDWIS systems such as CHANUTE, CITY OF; NEOSHO CO RWD 2; ERIE, CITY OF anchor Neosho, KS's EPA extract. Derived burden score 37/100 (Moderate Risk) uses fixed national caps on density, log release volume, Superfund count, and health-flagged systems - not an official EPA rating.
Health-flagged SDWIS rows in Neosho include NEOSHO CO RWD 2; ERIE, CITY OF; WILSON CO RWD 10, while Ash Grove Cement Co leads reported TRI pounds among local Form R filers. AQS median AQI 44 / peak 168 in 2024.
Burden score 37/100 (Moderate Risk) is the only weighted composite on this page. The tables below list every TRI facility, SDWIS system, and Superfund site EPA has on record for Neosho -- not just the names called out above -- reproducing the disclosure history as filed, not a current-safety verdict. Extract current as of 2026-08-25.
Release-over-release change
What changed for Neosho, KS: EPA TRI 2023 reporting year
Same facilities, both years
+5.9%
3 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
+5.9%
203.4 thousand lb → 215.4 thousand lb, every facility that filed
- Neosho, KS's total reported releases rose from 203.4 thousand lb in 2022 to 215.4 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Neosho, KS's land releases rose from 719 lb in 2022 to 10.0 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Neosho, KS's chemicals reported fell from 38 in 2022 to 37 in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Neosho, KS's air releases rose from 202.6 thousand lb in 2022 to 205.4 thousand lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
Air Quality History (2020–2024)
EPA Air Quality Index (AQI) data showing how many days per year fall into each air quality category.
| Year | Good | Moderate | Unhealthy (SG) | Max AQI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 247 (67%) | 116 | 2 | 168 |
| 2023 | 147 (40%) | 215 | 1 | 161 |
| 2022 | 201 (56%) | 159 | 0 | 94 |
| 2021 | 171 (47%) | 189 | 2 | 145 |
| 2020 | 235 (64%) | 129 | 2 | 106 |
Source: EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Annual AQI by County AQI categories: Good (0-50), Moderate (51-100), Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (101-150), Unhealthy (151-200), Very Unhealthy (201-300), Hazardous (301+)
For real-time air quality readings and pollutant breakdowns in Kansas, see the EPA's AirNow.gov.
Water Systems (16)
| System | System pop (SDWIS) | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| CHANUTE, CITY OF | 8,642 | 0 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 2 | 1,210 | 11 |
| ERIE, CITY OF | 1,037 | 2 |
| WILSON CO RWD 10 | 808 | 1 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 1C | 670 | 8 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 7 | 625 | 1 |
| ST PAUL, CITY OF | 597 | 3 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 12 | 437 | 0 |
| THAYER, CITY OF | 433 | 2 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 8 | 323 | 3 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 6 | 314 | 0 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 9 | 200 | 1 |
| GALESBURG, CITY OF | 147 | 6 |
| NEOSHO CO RWD 3 | 128 | 0 |
| ALLEN CO RWD 13 | 100 | 0 |
| COAL HOLLOW WATER COMPANY | 55 | 0 |
TRI Facilities (3)
| # | Facility | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ash Grove Cement Co | 929.5K lbs |
| 2 | Hi-Lo Industries Inc | 98.0K lbs |
| 3 | Hbd/thermoid Inc | 16.3K lbs |
Cities in Neosho (6)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the environmental risk level in Neosho, Kansas? ▼
Are there Superfund sites in Neosho? ▼
How many toxic release facilities are in Neosho? ▼
What is the air quality in Neosho? ▼
Is the drinking water safe in Neosho? ▼
What environmental agencies cover Neosho? ▼
What does this county environmental profile show?
This county environmental profile rolls up EPA Toxics Release Inventory facility reports, Safe Drinking Water Information System public-water-system filings, and Superfund National Priorities List sites for the county boundary defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Facility counts reflect facilities with a reporting address inside the county, not where downstream environmental effects may be observed. Population figures are from the most recent Census ACS 5-year estimate. The county detail page is updated whenever the upstream EPA programs publish revised data; see the methodology page for the documented ingest cadence and the editorial choices governing how aggregations are computed.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.