TRI Facilities
43
EPCRA Section 313 reporters
2023 EPA TRI data 43 facilities 380 water systems
Vermont Environmental Profile
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List, this is Vermont's (VT) full public environmental-compliance record - toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.
VT regulatory profile by statute
Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks
- CWA · NPDES
Clean Water Act, NPDES (water-system health violations)
264 records
- RCRA · Subtitle C 14
RCRA Subtitle C (Superfund-site proxy)
14 records
What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.
Water Systems
380
SDWIS regulated
Superfund Sites
14
12 active NPL
Total Releases
2.1M lbs
TRI cumulative disclosure
Compliance Snapshot - VT
Sites with no recorded health violations 37.6%
Sites with at least one open violation 62.4%
Vermont consolidates three federal EPA datasets into one statewide environmental profile: 43 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities reporting under EPCRA Section 313, 380 community water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and 14 sites on the Superfund National Priorities List.
TRI facilities in VT have cumulatively disclosed 2.1M lbs of toxic chemical releases, while SDWIS records show 1,090 total violations across the state's regulated water systems, of which 264 systems carry an active health-based violation (MCL exceedance or treatment-technique failure). Activity clusters in counties such as Chittenden, Rutland, Washington, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence.
Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.
What does this state's environmental record show?
TRI Facilities
43
Water Systems
380
Superfund Sites
14
Total Violations
1,090
Total Releases
2.1M lbs
Health Violations
264
water systems
Largest Polluters
View all →| # | Facility | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Globalfoundries U.S. 2 LLC - Vermont Facility | 798.3K lbs |
| 2 | Agri-Mark Inc | 213.5K lbs |
| 3 | Franklin Foods | 185.6K lbs |
| 4 | Garware Fulflex USA Inc. | 174.5K lbs |
| 5 | Commonwealth Dairy LLC | 163.2K lbs |
| 6 | Ge Aerospace Plant 2 | 159.4K lbs |
| 7 | Ge Aerospace Plant 1 | 110.0K lbs |
| 8 | U.S. Army National Guard Ethan Allen Firing Range | 108.3K lbs |
| 9 | Tansitor Electronics Inc | 64.9K lbs |
| 10 | Weidmann Electrical Technology Inc | 45.7K lbs |
| 11 | St Albans Creamery LLC | 40.6K lbs |
| 12 | Questech Corp | 11.4K lbs |
| 13 | Perrigo Nutritionals | 4.2K lbs |
| 14 | Ce Bradley Laboratories Inc | 3.4K lbs |
| 15 | Mylan Technologies Inc | 3.3K lbs |
| 16 | Ben & Jerry's Homemade Inc St Albans | 3.3K lbs |
| 17 | Isovolta/u.s. Samica | 3.2K lbs |
| 18 | Revision Military | 3.1K lbs |
| 19 | Hazelett Strip Casting Corp | 1.4K lbs |
| 20 | Tivoly Inc. | 1.2K lbs |
Water Quality
Systems with Health Violations
| Water System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| HEMLOCK RIDGE CONDOMINIUM | 63 | 35 |
| BATTLEGROUND CONDOMINIUM | 166 | 34 |
| CHRISTMAS TREE - SUNDOWN CONDOMINIUM | 110 | 32 |
| WATERVILLE FIRE DISTRICT 1 | 84 | 26 |
| WHIFFLETREE CONDOMINIUM | 189 | 24 |
| VERNON HALL | 50 | 21 |
| WHEELOCK FIRE DISTRICT 1 | 50 | 16 |
| HUNTINGTON FIRE DISTRICT 1 | 120 | 16 |
| COUNTRY CLUB CONDOMINIUM | 80 | 16 |
| KILLINGTON GATEWAY I CONDO ASSOCIATION | 68 | 15 |
| DANBY MOUNT TABOR F D 1 | 385 | 14 |
| MORRISTOWN CORNERS WATER CORP | 150 | 13 |
| HERITAGE HILL ASSOCIATION | 102 | 13 |
| WESTMINSTER AQUEDUCT SOCIETY | 150 | 12 |
| SUNTEC FOREST CONDOMINIUM | 240 | 11 |
| SUTTON WATER SYSTEM | 185 | 10 |
| SHEFFIELD FIRE DISTRICT 1 | 50 | 10 |
| SPRING LAKE RANCH INC | 70 | 10 |
| JERICHO HEIGHTS WATER COOP | 40 | 9 |
| ST GEORGE FIRE DISTRICT #2 | 72 | 9 |
Cities with Water Issues
Bellows Falls
Pop: -
Westminster
Pop: -
Bennington
Pop: -
Putney
Pop: -
Colchester
Pop: -
Enosburg Falls
Pop: -
Jericho
Pop: -
Georgia
Pop: -
Richford
Pop: -
Swanton
Pop: -
Vergennes
Pop: -
Williston
Pop: -
Cabot
Pop: -
Barre
Pop: -
Rutland
Pop: -
Middlebury
Pop: -
Burlington
Pop: -
Windsor
Pop: -
Newport
Pop: -
Killington
Pop: -
Superfund Sites (14)
| Site Name | Status | HRS Score |
|---|---|---|
| Bennington Municipal Sanitary Landfill | NPL Site | 49.07 |
| BFI Sanitary Landfill (Rockingham) | NPL Site | 41.92 |
| Burgess Brothers Landfill | NPL Site | 52.58 |
| Commerce Street Plume | NPL Site | 48.48 |
| Darling Hill Dump | Deleted NPL Site | 43.92 |
| Elizabeth Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Ely Copper Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Jard Company, Inc. | NPL Site | 58.31 |
| Old Springfield Landfill | NPL Site | 34.79 |
| Parker Sanitary Landfill | NPL Site | 52.29 |
| Pike Hill Copper Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Pine Street Canal | NPL Site | - |
| Pownal Tannery | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Tansitor Electronics, Inc. | Deleted NPL Site | 35.72 |
Counties (14 total)
| County | Facilities |
|---|---|
| Chittenden | 6 |
| Rutland | 7 |
| Washington | 2 |
| Windham | 7 |
| Windsor | 0 |
| Bennington | 2 |
| Franklin | 10 |
| Caledonia | 3 |
| Orange | 0 |
| Orleans | 2 |
| Lamoille | 0 |
| Addison | 3 |
| Essex | 1 |
| Grand Isle | 0 |
Largest Cities
Bellows Falls
Pop: -
1 facilities · 3 water systems
Westminster
Pop: -
1 facilities · 2 water systems
Bennington
Pop: -
2 facilities · 6 water systems
Brattleboro
Pop: -
4 facilities · 3 water systems
Putney
Pop: -
1 facilities · 2 water systems
Colchester
Pop: -
2 facilities · 5 water systems
Essex Junction
Pop: -
2 facilities · 2 water systems
Enosburg Falls
Pop: -
1 facilities · 2 water systems
Jericho
Pop: -
1 facilities · 4 water systems
Georgia
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Richford
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Saint Albans
Pop: -
5 facilities · 0 water systems
New Haven
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Sheldon Springs
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Swanton
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Vergennes
Pop: -
1 facilities · 2 water systems
Williston
Pop: -
1 facilities · 5 water systems
Cabot
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Barre
Pop: -
1 facilities · 5 water systems
Rutland
Pop: -
4 facilities · 17 water systems
Frequently Asked Questions
How many polluting facilities are in Vermont? ▼
Vermont has 43 facilities that report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). These facilities have collectively reported 2.1M lbs in total toxic chemical releases. TRI data is self-reported annually by facilities that manufacture, process, or use listed toxic chemicals above threshold amounts.
Does Vermont have Superfund sites? ▼
Yes, Vermont has 14 sites on the EPA Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). Superfund sites are contaminated locations identified for long-term cleanup under the EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Is the water safe in Vermont? ▼
Vermont has 380 EPA-regulated water systems. 264 water systems have reported health-based violations (MCL exceedances). A past violation does not necessarily mean water is currently unsafe. For current water quality, contact your local water utility. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental data is available for Vermont? ▼
PlainEnviro provides three categories of EPA environmental data for Vermont: Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data covering 43 industrial facilities, Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) data for 380 water systems, and Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) data for 14 contaminated sites.
How does Vermont compare to other states environmentally? ▼
Vermont has 43 TRI facilities with 2.1M lbs in total releases, 14 Superfund sites, and 1,090 water system violations on record. State-level environmental comparisons depend on many factors including industrial activity, population, and geographic size. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL databases.
Explore More Data for Vermont
TRI Facilities in Vermont →
Every toxic-release facility reporting in the state, ranked by volume
Drinking Water Systems in Vermont →
Community water systems and their violation records
Air Quality in Vermont →
County-level AQI from EPA monitoring stations
Compare states by burden →
EJ screening scores for every U.S. county
State environmental rankings →
How states compare on releases, water and Superfund
Browse all states →
Environmental profiles for every U.S. state
About This Data
This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for Vermont: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.
PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.
What to do with Vermont's data
Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.
- Check the 43 TRI facilities reporting in Vermont for the largest reported releases near a specific county. View facilities
- 264 water systems in the state have a recorded health-based violation, check if yours is one of them. Check water systems
- See how Vermont compares to other states on releases, water violations, and Superfund sites. State rankings
Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Data sourced from U.S. EPA environmental datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro Editorial
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, this state profile is drawn from PlainEnviro's database of more than 25,000 EPA-tracked facilities, the Safe Drinking Water Information System, and the Superfund National Priorities List, compiled since federal reporting began under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act in October 1986; see our methodology for full source citations and refresh cadence.
Every figure on PlainEnviro is rendered directly from EPA environmental compliance data, no number is typed in by an editor. State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.