NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION
PWSID: AR0000557 · Strong, AR · Serves 850 people
According to EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION (PWSID AR0000557) in Strong, AR is listed as a CWS water system covering about 850 people. The same extract lists 76 health-based violation records spanning 2013-2022. Those 76 health-based rows for NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION cover contaminants such as TTHM, Coliform (TCR), Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5); they remain historical EPA registry entries, not a current compliance or drinkability score.
NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION has 76 health-based violation records in this historical extract. Monitoring and reporting records are not included.
PlainEnviro's health-based SDWIS extract covers monitoring and reporting violations only -- it does not include unresolved enforcement actions in progress or corrective steps a utility has taken since the extract date. 3 distinct EPA contaminant codes appear in this system's record, including TTHM, Coliform (TCR), Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). Recorded violations span 2013–2022. Day-to-day primacy enforcement for this system runs through the Arkansas drinking-water program, not EPA directly.
A historical health-based record does not necessarily describe current water quality or compliance. The most authoritative current source is the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report. For enforcement history and corrective-action orders, consult EPA ECHO and the Arkansas state drinking-water program's public portal.
System Details
- EPA ID (PWSID)
- AR0000557
- System Type
- CWS
- Water Source
- Groundwater
- Location
- Strong, AR
- Population Served
- 850
- Health Violations
- Yes (76)
What contaminants are in this water system?
| Contaminant | Violations | Health-Based |
|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 66 | 66 |
| Coliform (TCR) | 8 | 8 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2 | 2 |
Violation History (76)
| Contaminant | Health | Date |
|---|---|---|
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2022 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2020 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2020 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2020 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2020 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2019 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2018 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2018 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2018 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2018 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2017 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2017 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2017 |
| TTHM | Yes | Apr 1, 2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Yes | Jan 1, 2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | Yes | Jan 1, 2017 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2016 |
| TTHM | Yes | Oct 1, 2016 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2016 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jul 1, 2016 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2015 |
| TTHM | Yes | Jan 1, 2015 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Nov 1, 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Nov 1, 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Aug 1, 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Aug 1, 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Mar 1, 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Mar 1, 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Nov 1, 2013 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Yes | Nov 1, 2013 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does EPA SDWIS list for NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION?
How many people does NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION serve?
What violations does NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION have?
What contaminants have been found in NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION water?
Compare beyond Arkansas
Nationwide peers by violations & population served
Cross-state SDWIS systems nearest NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION on cumulative violation count (76) and EPA-reported population served (850). Violation-count peers include HUGHSON, CITY OF, CITY OF MANSFIELD WATER SYSTEM, TDCJ PACK UNIT. Population peers include Coyote Valley System, MOUNTAIN VILLAGE WATER SYSTEM, SIERRA CEDARS CSD.
Similar violation count
Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by SDWIS violations on record.
Similar population served
Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ gate).
Nearby Water Systems
Explore More
About This Data
NEW LONDON WATER ASSOCIATION (AR0000557) is drawn from EPA SDWIS. Nearby county systems in this extract include EL DORADO WATERWORKS; SMACKOVER WATERWORKS; PARKERS CHAPEL PUBLIC WATER; FRENCHPORT WATER ASSOCIATION. Health-based rows (76 MCL/TT) are historical registry state, not a current drinkability score.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SDWIS Federal Reporting Services
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.