TRI Facilities
316
Very high
CO · EPA TRI · SDWIS · Superfund
Colorado environmental disclosure record
According to EPA's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List extracts, this is Colorado's full public registry profile, toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.
- TRI facilities
- 316
- Reported releases
- 112.9M lbs
- #34 of 56
- Water systems
- 1,109
- Superfund NPL sites
- 24
Colorado vs. every U.S. state
Cumulative TRI-reported release pounds, with this state marked in the national distribution
113M lbs 39th percentile higher than 39% of 56 states with TRI reporters
Each bar is a $1M-wide band; taller bars hold more states with TRI reporters. The dashed line and filled bar mark this facility. Hover, focus, or tap a bar for its full count, share, and position.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxics Release Inventory · 2023 reporting year
CO regulatory profile by statute
Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks
- CWA · NPDES
- RCRA · Subtitle C 24
What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.
How Colorado compares across two EPA disclosure measures
The highlighted point is Colorado. The vertical axis is the share of tracked water systems with at least one health-based SDWIS record; the horizontal axis is TRI-reported pounds per facility on a logarithmic scale so the full state distribution stays readable. The crosshairs use the portal’s published national benchmark medians.
This matrix compares disclosure rates, not toxicity, exposure, current compliance, or drinking-water safety. A lower position on either axis is not a safety rating; use the underlying facility and water-system records for context.
According to EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts, Colorado (CO) lists 316 TRI-reporting facilities disclosing 112.9M lbs of toxic releases. The same extracts list 24 Superfund sites and 1,109 EPA-regulated water systems, of which 439 carry health-based SDWIS violation rows. PlainEnviro's composite environmental health score for Colorado is 46/100 (grade F), benchmarked against all U.S. states on chemical release intensity, drinking-water health violations, Superfund site burden, and water violation rate. This is a percentile-derived composite from federal disclosure counts, not a clinical health-risk assessment.
F 46
Colorado Environmental Health Score
A percentile-benchmarked 0–100 composite from 4 EPA federal datasets, with weight redistribution for any unavailable dimension
Chemical Release Intensity D 60
357K (lbs per facility) Drinking Water Health Violations F 51
39.6% (% of systems) Superfund Site Burden F 17
7.6 (sites per 100 facilities) Water Violation Rate F 46
5.0 (violations per system) Benchmarks derived from EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts across all 56 U.S. states and territories
Water Systems
1,109
High
Superfund Sites
24
Moderate
Total Releases
112.9M lbs
Very high
Compliance Snapshot - CO
Sites with no recorded health violations 69.2%
Sites with at least one open violation 30.8%
Colorado's profile joins three independently maintained EPA programs into one statewide record: the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI, EPCRA Section 313 industrial disclosures), the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS, Safe Drinking Water Act compliance), and the Superfund National Priorities List. Each program uses its own reporting cadence and facility-identification scheme; PlainEnviro joins them by matched facility and system location rather than a shared federal ID, so a site absent from one program is never assumed absent from another. The counts below reflect the portal's rebuild as of August 2026.
Activity clusters in counties such as Weld, Jefferson, Adams, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence. Monitoring and reporting violations are not included in the SDWIS counts shown here.
Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.
What does this state's environmental record show?
TRI Facilities
316
Water Systems
1,109
Superfund Sites
24
Health-Based Violation Records
5,561
Total Releases
112.9M lbs
cumulative, all reported years
Systems with Records
439
water systems
Release-over-release change
What changed for Colorado: EPA TRI 2023 reporting year
Same facilities, both years
+18.5%
250 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
+18.7%
20.5 million lb → 24.3 million lb, every facility that filed
Between the two reporting years, 9 facilities filed for the first time and 16 stopped filing. Facilities entering or leaving the inventory are excluded from the same-facility comparison above.
- Colorado's total reported releases rose from 20.5 million lb in 2022 to 24.3 million lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Colorado's land releases rose from 14.0 million lb in 2022 to 17.7 million lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Colorado's off-site transfers rose from 3.3 million lb in 2022 to 3.5 million lb in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
- Colorado's chemicals reported rose from 105 in 2022 to 108 in 2023, based on EPA TRI filings.
Largest Polluters
View all →Water Quality
Systems with Health Violations
| Water System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| MAY VALLEY WA | 1,500 | 440 |
| SOUTH SWINK WATER AUTHORITY | 622 | 269 |
| VALLEY WC | 270 | 160 |
| SUN MEADOW ESTATES | 75 | 154 |
| BEEHIVE WATER ASSOCIATION | 154 | 127 |
| RYE TOWN OF | 745 | 119 |
| COUNTRY ACRES MHP (LA SALLE COUNTY) | 222 | 106 |
| VALLEY MOBILE HOME LLC | 85 | 104 |
| MANZANOLA TOWN OF | 497 | 98 |
| VROMAN WC | 125 | 96 |
| CHERAW TOWN OF | 254 | 92 |
| PATTERSON VALLEY WC | 96 | 90 |
| EUREKA WC | 498 | 89 |
| COLORADO CITY MD | 2,755 | 87 |
| BURLINGTON CITY OF | 3,720 | 83 |
| FAYETTE WC | 75 | 72 |
| EAST END WA | 70 | 69 |
| HOLBROOK CENTER SOFT WA | 54 | 69 |
| ROSA JOINT VENTURES WATER SYSTEM | 239 | 66 |
| RIVERSIDE WC | 90 | 58 |
Cities with Water Issues
Denver
57 water systems
Lakewood
53 water systems
Colorado Springs
40 water systems
Durango
38 water systems
Glenwood Springs
32 water systems
Cedaredge
28 water systems
Littleton
25 water systems
Wheat Ridge
25 water systems
Windsor
18 water systems
Carbondale
18 water systems
Montrose
16 water systems
Steamboat Springs
15 water systems
Aurora
14 water systems
Boulder
13 water systems
Glendale
13 water systems
Fort Collins
12 water systems
Lafayette
12 water systems
Centennial
12 water systems
Bayfield
11 water systems
Greenwood Village
10 water systems
Superfund Sites (24)
| Site Name | Status | HRS Score |
|---|---|---|
| Air Force Plant PJKS | NPL Site | 42.93 |
| Bonita Peak Mining District | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Broderick Wood Products | NPL Site | 35.13 |
| California Gulch | NPL Site | 55.84 |
| Captain Jack Mill | NPL Site | 50.56 |
| Central City, Clear Creek | NPL Site | 51.39 |
| Chemical Sales Co. | NPL Site | 37.93 |
| Colorado Smelter | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Denver Radium Site | NPL Site | 44.11 |
| Eagle Mine | NPL Site | 47.19 |
| Lincoln Park | NPL Site | 31.31 |
| Lowry Landfill | NPL Site | 48.36 |
| Marshall Landfill | NPL Site | 0.00 |
| Nelson Tunnel/Commodore Waste Rock | NPL Site | 48.03 |
| Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) | NPL Site | 64.32 |
| Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY) | NPL Site | 58.15 |
| Sand Creek Industrial | Deleted NPL Site | 59.65 |
| Smeltertown Site | Proposed NPL Site | 58.56 |
| Smuggler Mountain | Deleted NPL Site | 31.31 |
| Standard Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Summitville Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Uravan Uranium Project (Union Carbide Corp.) | NPL Site | 43.53 |
| Vasquez Boulevard and I-70 | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Woodbury Chemical Co. | Deleted NPL Site | 44.87 |
Counties (64 total)
| County | Facilities |
|---|---|
| Weld | 65 |
| Jefferson | 19 |
| Adams | 57 |
| El Paso | 25 |
| Denver | 21 |
| Arapahoe | 7 |
| Boulder | 19 |
| Larimer | 18 |
| La Plata | 3 |
| Delta | 0 |
| Garfield | 2 |
| Pitkin | 0 |
| Pueblo | 20 |
| Douglas | 12 |
| Grand | 2 |
| Montrose | 1 |
| Otero | 0 |
| Mesa | 11 |
| Gunnison | 0 |
| Eagle | 1 |
Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. Colorado has 64 counties total.
Cities with Environmental Records
Denver
38 facilities · 57 water systems
Colorado Springs
20 facilities · 40 water systems
Pueblo
19 facilities · 7 water systems
Longmont
12 facilities · 2 water systems
Aurora
11 facilities · 14 water systems
Fort Collins
11 facilities · 12 water systems
Greeley
11 facilities · 7 water systems
Grand Junction
11 facilities · 6 water systems
Fort Lupton
11 facilities · 5 water systems
Henderson
11 facilities · 2 water systems
Littleton
10 facilities · 25 water systems
Boulder
10 facilities · 13 water systems
Brighton
10 facilities · 7 water systems
Windsor
9 facilities · 18 water systems
Golden
8 facilities · 5 water systems
Commerce City
8 facilities · 1 water systems
Loveland
6 facilities · 9 water systems
Englewood
6 facilities · 6 water systems
Arvada
6 facilities · 3 water systems
Broomfield
5 facilities · 4 water systems
Frequently Asked Questions
How many TRI facilities are in Colorado? ▼
Colorado has 316 facilities that report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). These facilities have collectively reported 112.9M lbs in total toxic chemical releases. TRI data is self-reported annually by facilities that manufacture, process, or use listed toxic chemicals above threshold amounts.
Does Colorado have Superfund sites? ▼
Yes, Colorado has 24 sites on the EPA Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). Superfund sites are contaminated locations identified for long-term cleanup under the EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
What does EPA SDWIS list for drinking water in Colorado? ▼
Colorado has 1,109 EPA-regulated water systems in the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) extract used here. 439 water systems have a health-based violation row (MCL exceedance) in this historical extract. A past registry row is not a current drinkability verdict. For current utility conditions, contact the local water utility or the Colorado drinking water program. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental data is available for Colorado? ▼
PlainEnviro provides three categories of EPA environmental data for Colorado: Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data covering 316 industrial facilities, Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) data for 1,109 water systems, and Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) data for 24 contaminated sites.
How does Colorado compare to other states on EPA disclosure counts? ▼
Colorado has 316 TRI facilities with 112.9M lbs in total releases, 24 Superfund sites, and 5,561 water system violations on record. These are federal disclosure counts; they are not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk scores. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL databases.
What is Colorado's environmental health score? ▼
PlainEnviro's composite environmental health score for Colorado is 46/100 (grade F). This score combines four percentile-benchmarked dimensions from EPA federal extracts: chemical release intensity per TRI facility, drinking-water health violation rate from SDWIS, Superfund site burden relative to industrial activity, and overall water violation rate. Scores are benchmarked against all 56 U.S. states and territories. When a dimension lacks data, its weight redistributes to the remaining dimensions so the score never deflates from missing inputs. This is a registry-count composite, not a clinical exposure or health-outcome assessment.
Explore More Data for Colorado
TRI Facilities in Colorado →
Every toxic-release facility reporting in the state, ranked by volume
Drinking Water Systems in Colorado →
Community water systems and their violation records
Air Quality in Colorado →
County-level AQI from EPA monitoring stations
Compare states by burden →
EJ screening scores for every U.S. county
State environmental rankings →
How states compare on releases, water and Superfund
Browse all states →
Environmental profiles for every U.S. state
About This Data
This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for Colorado: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.
PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.
What to do with Colorado's data
Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.
- Check the 316 TRI facilities reporting in Colorado for the largest reported releases near a specific county. View facilities
- 439 water systems in the state have a recorded health-based violation, check if yours is one of them. Check water systems
- See how Colorado compares to other states on releases, water violations, and Superfund sites. State rankings
Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.
Use and verify this record
Colorado's profile brings together EPA release, drinking-water, and Superfund records. It reports the underlying programs without making a health or environmental-risk determination.
State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. The methodology records the joins, definitions, and refresh cadence for each program.
PlainEnviro renders public EPA records directly from its data pipeline; no figure on this page is typed in by an editor. See the editorial standards and corrections policy for how source changes and reported errors are handled.