TRI Facilities
2,342
Very high
TX · EPA TRI · SDWIS · Superfund
According to EPA's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List extracts, this is Texas's full public registry profile, toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.
Texas vs. every U.S. state
Cumulative TRI-reported release pounds, with this state marked in the national distribution
1088M lbs Top 5% higher than 95% of 56 states with TRI reporters
Each bar is a $1M-wide band; taller bars hold more states with TRI reporters. The dashed line and filled bar mark this facility. Hover, focus, or tap a bar for its full count, share, and position.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxics Release Inventory · 2023 reporting year
Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks
What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.
The highlighted point is Texas. The vertical axis is the share of tracked water systems with at least one health-based SDWIS record; the horizontal axis is TRI-reported pounds per facility on a logarithmic scale so the full state distribution stays readable. The crosshairs use the portal’s published national benchmark medians.
This matrix compares disclosure rates, not toxicity, exposure, current compliance, or drinking-water safety. A lower position on either axis is not a safety rating; use the underlying facility and water-system records for context.
According to EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts, Texas (TX) lists 2,342 TRI-reporting facilities disclosing 1.09B lbs of toxic releases. The same extracts list 70 Superfund sites and 4,620 EPA-regulated water systems, of which 1,807 carry health-based SDWIS violation rows. PlainEnviro's composite environmental health score for Texas is 47/100 (grade F), benchmarked against all U.S. states on chemical release intensity, drinking-water health violations, Superfund site burden, and water violation rate. This is a percentile-derived composite from federal disclosure counts, not a clinical health-risk assessment.
A percentile-benchmarked 0–100 composite from 4 EPA federal datasets, with weight redistribution for any unavailable dimension
Benchmarks derived from EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts across all 56 U.S. states and territories
TRI Facilities
2,342
Very high
Water Systems
4,620
Very high
Superfund Sites
70
Very high
Total Releases
1.09B lbs
Very high
Texas's profile joins three independently maintained EPA programs into one statewide record: the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI, EPCRA Section 313 industrial disclosures), the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS, Safe Drinking Water Act compliance), and the Superfund National Priorities List. Each program uses its own reporting cadence and facility-identification scheme; PlainEnviro joins them by matched facility and system location rather than a shared federal ID, so a site absent from one program is never assumed absent from another. The counts below reflect the portal's rebuild as of August 2026.
Activity clusters in counties such as Harris, Travis, Dallas, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence. Monitoring and reporting violations are not included in the SDWIS counts shown here.
Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.
Release-over-release change
Same facilities, both years
-10.4%
1,867 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
+7.0%
244.0 million lb → 261.2 million lb, every facility that filed
These two measures point in opposite directions. Releases from the facilities present in both years fell, while the inventory-wide total rose. The difference is which facilities filed, not a different estimate of the same plants.
Between the two reporting years, 109 facilities filed for the first time and 108 stopped filing. Facilities entering or leaving the inventory are excluded from the same-facility comparison above.
| # | Facility | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ascend Performance Materials-Chocolate Bayou Plant | 94.0M lbs |
| 2 | Ineos Nitriles USA LLC Green Lake Plant | 90.2M lbs |
| 3 | Tm Deer Park Services LP | 63.0M lbs |
| 4 | Sand Hills Gas Plant | 60.7M lbs |
| 5 | Midway Gas Plant | 42.1M lbs |
| 6 | US Ecology Texas Inc | 34.6M lbs |
| 7 | Blanchard Refining Co LLC | 23.5M lbs |
| 8 | Lyondell Chemical Co | 20.2M lbs |
| 9 | Union Processing Systems LLC | 18.3M lbs |
| 10 | Graphic Packaging International LLC | 17.5M lbs |
| 11 | Oak Grove Steam Electric Station | 13.8M lbs |
| 12 | Inv Nylon Chemicals Americas Victoria Site | 12.3M lbs |
| 13 | Nutrien US LLC | 11.6M lbs |
| 14 | Isp Technologies Inc | 11.5M lbs |
| 15 | Eastman Chemical Co Texas Operations | 11.3M lbs |
| 16 | Exxonmobil Refining & Supply Baytown Refinery (part) | 10.9M lbs |
| 17 | Martin Lake Steam Electric Station & Lignite Mine | 10.1M lbs |
| 18 | Pilgrim's Pride Corp Mt Pleasant Complex | 9.9M lbs |
| 19 | King Ranch Gas Plant | 9.8M lbs |
| 20 | Valero Refining - Texas L.P. Houston Refinery | 9.4M lbs |
| Water System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| CITY OF BRADY WATER SYSTEM | 5,371 | 1013 |
| TEMPE WSC 1 | 2,725 | 573 |
| STORMLIGHT MOBILE HOME PARK | 76 | 350 |
| VALLEY ESTATES | 68 | 349 |
| CITY OF NOME | 825 | 331 |
| CITY OF ROSE CITY | 664 | 313 |
| CITY OF SEAGRAVES | 2,417 | 311 |
| CITY OF OPDYKE WEST | 220 | 307 |
| CITY OF PLAINS | 1,355 | 304 |
| FOREST WSC | 651 | 301 |
| SEVEN ESTATES | 189 | 293 |
| KENDALL COUNTY WCID 1 | 3,579 | 289 |
| MILLERSVIEW DOOLE WSC | 3,987 | 280 |
| CITY OF MASON | 2,228 | 276 |
| CITY OF NEW HOME | 965 | 252 |
| TOWN NORTH ESTATES | 216 | 243 |
| KLONDIKE ISD | 311 | 242 |
| ROWENA WSC | 528 | 239 |
| CITY OF SEMINOLE | 7,386 | 234 |
| VILLAGE OF SURFSIDE BEACH | 5,697 | 229 |
| County | Facilities |
|---|---|
| Harris | 434 |
| Travis | 37 |
| Dallas | 154 |
| Tarrant | 161 |
| Montgomery | 33 |
| Bexar | 78 |
| Brazoria | 56 |
| Fort Bend | 28 |
| Denton | 34 |
| Jefferson | 65 |
| Mclennan | 37 |
| Collin | 37 |
| Walker | 6 |
| Ellis | 44 |
| Polk | 6 |
| Johnson | 28 |
| Parker | 21 |
| Williamson | 25 |
| Bell | 28 |
| Grayson | 11 |
Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. Texas has 253 counties total.
This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for Texas: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.
PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.
What to do with Texas's data
Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.
Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.
Use and verify this record
Texas's profile brings together EPA release, drinking-water, and Superfund records. It reports the underlying programs without making a health or environmental-risk determination.
State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. The methodology records the joins, definitions, and refresh cadence for each program.
PlainEnviro renders public EPA records directly from its data pipeline; no figure on this page is typed in by an editor. See the editorial standards and corrections policy for how source changes and reported errors are handled.