2023 EPA TRI data 660 facilities 557 water systems

South Carolina Environmental Profile

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List, this is South Carolina's (SC) full public environmental-compliance record - toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.

SC regulatory profile by statute

Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks

records

What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.

Source EPA SDWIS / Superfund

TRI Facilities

660

EPCRA Section 313 reporters

Water Systems

557

SDWIS regulated

Superfund Sites

34

28 active NPL

Total Releases

203.0M lbs

TRI cumulative disclosure

Compliance Snapshot - SC

Sites with no recorded health violations 86.8%
Sites with at least one open violation 13.2%

South Carolina consolidates three federal EPA datasets into one statewide environmental profile: 660 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities reporting under EPCRA Section 313, 557 community water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and 34 sites on the Superfund National Priorities List.

TRI facilities in SC have cumulatively disclosed 203.0M lbs of toxic chemical releases, while SDWIS records show 647 total violations across the state's regulated water systems, of which 161 systems carry an active health-based violation (MCL exceedance or treatment-technique failure). Activity clusters in counties such as Kershaw, Greenville, Spartanburg, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence.

Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.

What does this state's environmental record show?

TRI Facilities
660
Water Systems
557
Superfund Sites
34
Total Violations
647
Total Releases
203.0M lbs
Health Violations
161
water systems

Largest Polluters

View all →
# Facility Total Releases
1 Oceanagold Haile Gold Mine 30.2M lbs
2 Nucor Steel-Berkeley 13.1M lbs
3 International Paper Georgetown Mill 13.0M lbs
4 New-Indy Catawba LLC 10.5M lbs
5 Si Group Inc 9.1M lbs
6 Sylvamo Eastover Mill 9.0M lbs
7 Domtar Paper Co 6.2M lbs
8 Kapstone Paper & Packaging Corp 5.8M lbs
9 Westrock Cp LLC 5.7M lbs
10 Cross Generating Station 4.8M lbs
11 Clarios LLC 3.9M lbs
12 Inv Camden Plant 3.6M lbs
13 Fujifilm Manufacturing USA Inc. 3.1M lbs
14 Alpek Polyester USA Llc-Columbia Site 2.8M lbs
15 Holcim (us) Inc Holly Hill Plant 2.8M lbs
16 Century Aluminum of South Carolina 2.7M lbs
17 Dcl - Bushy Park Facility 2.7M lbs
18 Bmw Manufacturing Co LLC 2.5M lbs
19 Nucor Steel-Darlington 2.4M lbs
20 3V Sigma USA 2.3M lbs

Water Quality

Systems with Health Violations

Water System Population Violations
SANDY RUN MHP (SC0860037) 41 38
CHERAW TOWN OF (SC1310001) 6,325 34
LOCKHART TOWN OF (SC4420010) 560 33
SALUDA CPW (SC4110001) 3,390 24
SALUDA CO W&S AUTHORITY (4120001) 4,535 24
CARLISLE TOWN OF (4410003) 555 23
DEWEES UTILITIES (SC1050011) 55 22
MCCORMICK CO W&SA (SC3520002) 8,500 20
HEMINGWAY TOWN OF (SC4510004) 3,191 13
SANTUCK HEBRON WATER CO (4420007) 3,097 12
YORK CITY OF (SC4610001) 8,700 12
YORK COUNTY EAST WD (SC4620002) 30,225 12
MCCORMICK CPW (3510001) 1,818 11
DANIEL MORGAN WATER DISTRICT (1120001) 5,314 10
CALHOUN FALLS TOWN OF (SC0110002) 2,473 9
GCWSD CARVERS BAY (SC2220013) 3,133 9
WCWSA (SC4510007) 7,099 9
WATER OAK UTILITY CO (SC0750002) 2,318 8
DCWS I-95 (SC1870914) 102 8
AIKEN CITY OF (0210001) 45,090 7

Cities with Water Issues

Superfund Sites (34)

Site Name Status HRS Score
Aqua-Tech Environmental Inc. (Groce Laboratories) NPL Site 50.00
Barite Hill/Nevada Goldfields NPL Site 50.00
Beaunit Corp. (Circular Knit & Dye) NPL Site 32.44
Brewer Gold Mine NPL Site 50.00
Burlington Industries Cheraw NPL Site 48.00
Carolawn, Inc. NPL Site 32.04
Clearwater Finishing NPL Site 47.99
Elmore Waste Disposal NPL Site 31.45
Galey and Lord Plant NPL Site 50.00
Geiger (C & M Oil) Deleted NPL Site 32.25
Golden Strip Septic Tank Service Deleted NPL Site 40.30
Helena Chemical Co. Landfill NPL Site 33.89
Independent Nail Co. Deleted NPL Site 57.90
Kalama Specialty Chemicals NPL Site 57.90
Koppers Co., Inc. (Charleston Plant) NPL Site 50.00
Koppers Co., Inc. (Florence Plant) Deleted NPL Site 51.27
Leonard Chemical Co., Inc. NPL Site 47.10
Lexington County Landfill Area NPL Site 37.93
Macalloy Corporation NPL Site 50.00
Medley Farm Drum Dump NPL Site 31.58
Palmetto Recycling, Inc. Deleted NPL Site 29.46
Palmetto Wood Preserving NPL Site 38.43
Para-Chem Southern, Inc. NPL Site 32.94
Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot NPL Site 50.00
Rochester Property Deleted NPL Site 36.72
Rock Hill Chemical Co. NPL Site 40.29
Sangamo Weston, Inc./Twelve-Mile Creek/Lake Hartwell PCB Contamination NPL Site 37.63
Savannah River Site (USDOE) NPL Site 47.70
SCRDI Bluff Road NPL Site -
SCRDI Dixiana NPL Site 40.70
Shuron Inc. NPL Site 68.26
Townsend Saw Chain Co. NPL Site 35.94
US Finishing/Cone Mills NPL Site 50.00
Wamchem, Inc. NPL Site 47.70

Counties (47 total)

Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. South Carolina has 47 counties total.

Largest Cities

Walterboro
Pop: -
3 facilities · 2 water systems
Bamberg
Pop: -
3 facilities · 1 water systems
Batesburg
Pop: -
2 facilities · 0 water systems
Bethune
Pop: -
1 facilities · 2 water systems
Alcolu
Pop: -
2 facilities · 0 water systems
Bishopville
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Blythewood
Pop: -
6 facilities · 0 water systems
Lugoff
Pop: -
3 facilities · 2 water systems
Camden
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water systems
Carlisle
Pop: -
1 facilities · 2 water systems
Cassatt
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Cayce
Pop: -
3 facilities · 0 water systems
Cope
Pop: -
1 facilities · 0 water systems
Eastover
Pop: -
3 facilities · 1 water systems
Elgin
Pop: -
1 facilities · 103 water systems
Eutawville
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems
Holly Hill
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water systems
Gaston
Pop: -
5 facilities · 5 water systems
Kershaw
Pop: -
2 facilities · 1 water systems
Lamar
Pop: -
1 facilities · 1 water systems

Frequently Asked Questions

How many polluting facilities are in South Carolina?
South Carolina has 660 facilities that report to the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). These facilities have collectively reported 203.0M lbs in total toxic chemical releases. TRI data is self-reported annually by facilities that manufacture, process, or use listed toxic chemicals above threshold amounts.
Does South Carolina have Superfund sites?
Yes, South Carolina has 34 sites on the EPA Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). Superfund sites are contaminated locations identified for long-term cleanup under the EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Is the water safe in South Carolina?
South Carolina has 557 EPA-regulated water systems. 161 water systems have reported health-based violations (MCL exceedances). A past violation does not necessarily mean water is currently unsafe. For current water quality, contact your local water utility. Source: EPA SDWIS.
What environmental data is available for South Carolina?
PlainEnviro provides three categories of EPA environmental data for South Carolina: Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data covering 660 industrial facilities, Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) data for 557 water systems, and Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) data for 34 contaminated sites.
How does South Carolina compare to other states environmentally?
South Carolina has 660 TRI facilities with 203.0M lbs in total releases, 34 Superfund sites, and 647 water system violations on record. State-level environmental comparisons depend on many factors including industrial activity, population, and geographic size. Source: EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL databases.

About This Data

This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for South Carolina: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.

PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.

What to do with South Carolina's data

Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.

  • Check the 660 TRI facilities reporting in South Carolina for the largest reported releases near a specific county. View facilities
  • 161 water systems in the state have a recorded health-based violation, check if yours is one of them. Check water systems
  • See how South Carolina compares to other states on releases, water violations, and Superfund sites. State rankings

Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.

Related

Data sourced from U.S. EPA environmental datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainEnviro Editorial

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, this state profile is drawn from PlainEnviro's database of more than 25,000 EPA-tracked facilities, the Safe Drinking Water Information System, and the Superfund National Priorities List, compiled since federal reporting began under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act in October 1986; see our methodology for full source citations and refresh cadence.

Every figure on PlainEnviro is rendered directly from EPA environmental compliance data, no number is typed in by an editor. State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.