TRI Facilities
124
Moderate
SD · EPA TRI · SDWIS · Superfund
According to EPA's 2023 Toxics Release Inventory, Safe Drinking Water Information System, and Superfund National Priorities List extracts, this is South Dakota's full public registry profile, toxic releases, drinking-water systems, and Superfund sites in one place.
South Dakota vs. every U.S. state
Cumulative TRI-reported release pounds, with this state marked in the national distribution
43M lbs 27th percentile higher than 27% of 56 states with TRI reporters
Each bar is a $1M-wide band; taller bars hold more states with TRI reporters. The dashed line and filled bar mark this facility. Hover, focus, or tap a bar for its full count, share, and position.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxics Release Inventory · 2023 reporting year
Violation/site counts mapped to the EPA statutes this portal tracks
What this shows Counts are mapped to statute as a structural proxy and reflect reported activity, not toxicity-weighted or population-adjusted risk. Clean Air Act (Title V) permit data is not currently ingested by this portal, so air-permit compliance is not shown here.
The highlighted point is South Dakota. The vertical axis is the share of tracked water systems with at least one health-based SDWIS record; the horizontal axis is TRI-reported pounds per facility on a logarithmic scale so the full state distribution stays readable. The crosshairs use the portal’s published national benchmark medians.
This matrix compares disclosure rates, not toxicity, exposure, current compliance, or drinking-water safety. A lower position on either axis is not a safety rating; use the underlying facility and water-system records for context.
According to EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts, South Dakota (SD) lists 124 TRI-reporting facilities disclosing 43.0M lbs of toxic releases. The same extracts list 4 Superfund sites and 513 EPA-regulated water systems, of which 261 carry health-based SDWIS violation rows. PlainEnviro's composite environmental health score for South Dakota is 51/100 (grade F), benchmarked against all U.S. states on chemical release intensity, drinking-water health violations, Superfund site burden, and water violation rate. This is a percentile-derived composite from federal disclosure counts, not a clinical health-risk assessment.
A percentile-benchmarked 0–100 composite from 4 EPA federal datasets, with weight redistribution for any unavailable dimension
Benchmarks derived from EPA TRI, SDWIS, and Superfund NPL extracts across all 56 U.S. states and territories
TRI Facilities
124
Moderate
Water Systems
513
Moderate
Superfund Sites
4
Very low
Total Releases
43.0M lbs
High
South Dakota's profile joins three independently maintained EPA programs into one statewide record: the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI, EPCRA Section 313 industrial disclosures), the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS, Safe Drinking Water Act compliance), and the Superfund National Priorities List. Each program uses its own reporting cadence and facility-identification scheme; PlainEnviro joins them by matched facility and system location rather than a shared federal ID, so a site absent from one program is never assumed absent from another. The counts below reflect the portal's rebuild as of August 2026.
Activity clusters in counties such as Meade, Minnehaha, Pennington, which account for the highest combined facility, water-system, and Superfund presence. Monitoring and reporting violations are not included in the SDWIS counts shown here.
Every figure reflects the public regulatory record as filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and is not weighted for toxicity, geographic footprint, or population exposure. A state can rank high in any individual metric because of industrial history, naturally occurring contaminants in source water, or simply the number of reporting facilities, not because current residents face unsafe conditions. Drill into any county or water system below for the full disclosure record.
Release-over-release change
Same facilities, both years
-1.5%
106 facilities that filed in 2022 and 2023
Whole inventory
-1.5%
8.6 million lb → 8.5 million lb, every facility that filed
Between the two reporting years, 6 facilities filed for the first time and 3 stopped filing. Facilities entering or leaving the inventory are excluded from the same-facility comparison above.
| # | Facility | Total Releases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp - Sioux Falls | 21.3M lbs |
| 2 | Wharf Resources | 8.0M lbs |
| 3 | Novita Aurora LLC | 2.5M lbs |
| 4 | Otter Tail Power Co Big Stone Plant | 2.2M lbs |
| 5 | South Dakota Soybean Processors | 2.0M lbs |
| 6 | Ag Processing Inc | 1.3M lbs |
| 7 | New Angus LLC | 836.6K lbs |
| 8 | Workhorse Cabs LLC DBA Crenlo Engineered Cabs | 775.7K lbs |
| 9 | Masterbrand Cabinets LLC | 421.0K lbs |
| 10 | Design Tanks LLC | 247.4K lbs |
| 11 | Showplace Wood Products | 227.8K lbs |
| 12 | Solventum Brookings | 224.5K lbs |
| 13 | Hydro Extrusion USA LLC | 223.2K lbs |
| 14 | Poet Biorefining - Hudson | 203.9K lbs |
| 15 | Dakota Ethanol LLC | 194.4K lbs |
| 16 | Pete Lien & Sons Inc | 193.6K lbs |
| 17 | Marmen Energy Co | 192.0K lbs |
| 18 | Glacial Lakes Energy LLC | 162.9K lbs |
| 19 | Aberdeen Energy LLC | 161.1K lbs |
| 20 | Woodland Cabinetry Inc | 143.6K lbs |
| Water System | Population | Violations |
|---|---|---|
| SHIRT TAIL GULCH DEVELOPMENT | 65 | 187 |
| CEDAR GULCH 2 | 40 | 57 |
| OAK MOUNTAIN COUNTRY ESTATES | 85 | 41 |
| MEADOW CREST SANITARY DISTRICT | 63 | 32 |
| VIEWFIELD RURAL WATER SYSTEM | 220 | 32 |
| GOLDEN VALLEY WATER COMPANY | 283 | 21 |
| OWANKA RURAL WATER SYSTEM | 52 | 20 |
| BOX ELDER | 14,000 | 19 |
| ABERDEEN | 27,989 | 17 |
| NORTH MARTIN WATER SYSTEM | 78 | 15 |
| GARDEN CITY | 33 | 15 |
| BUFFALO GAP | 126 | 13 |
| SUMMIT | 288 | 13 |
| ROSHOLT | 379 | 12 |
| PROVO AREA WATER SYSTEM | 25 | 12 |
| YANKTON | 15,411 | 12 |
| MASKELL, VILLAGE OF | 86 | 10 |
| WALNUT PARK | 180 | 10 |
| PINE HILLS PARK | 200 | 9 |
| REYNOLDS COURT | 28 | 9 |
| Site Name | Status | HRS Score |
|---|---|---|
| Ellsworth Air Force Base | NPL Site | 33.62 |
| Gilt Edge Mine | NPL Site | 50.00 |
| Whitewood Creek | Deleted NPL Site | 0.00 |
| Williams Pipe Line Co. Disposal Pit | Deleted NPL Site | 42.24 |
| County | Facilities |
|---|---|
| Meade | 0 |
| Minnehaha | 27 |
| Pennington | 8 |
| Lawrence | 4 |
| Brown | 8 |
| Oglala Lakota | 0 |
| Brookings | 9 |
| Codington | 12 |
| Yankton | 9 |
| Roberts | 2 |
| Lincoln | 5 |
| Beadle | 7 |
| Kingsbury | 0 |
| Fall River | 0 |
| Marshall | 1 |
| Butte | 1 |
| Charles Mix | 1 |
| Spink | 1 |
| Moody | 0 |
| Turner | 2 |
Showing top 20 counties by environmental activity. South Dakota has 67 counties total.
This page aggregates environmental data from three EPA programs for South Dakota: the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for industrial chemical releases, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for water quality, and the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) for hazardous waste cleanup sites.
PlainEnviro presents this data without advocacy framing. Numbers reflect reported data and may not capture all environmental activity. For specific health or environmental concerns, contact your state environmental agency.
What to do with South Dakota's data
Use this state profile as a starting point, then drill into the specific dataset that matters to you.
Reported data reflects what facilities and agencies disclose to the EPA; it is not a complete measure of environmental risk or a substitute for local guidance.
Use and verify this record
South Dakota's profile brings together EPA release, drinking-water, and Superfund records. It reports the underlying programs without making a health or environmental-risk determination.
State environmental figures are computed directly from EPA data. The methodology records the joins, definitions, and refresh cadence for each program.
PlainEnviro renders public EPA records directly from its data pipeline; no figure on this page is typed in by an editor. See the editorial standards and corrections policy for how source changes and reported errors are handled.